• @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    353 months ago

    Why don’t companies have someone in product development who’s entire job is to point out less than desirable ways people will use their products, or protect against rule 34 or the like? The internet has been around long enough that it shouldn’t have been a surprise that there were people who wanted to fuck a plastic lamprey eel. How as this even surprising?

    • @MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      343 months ago

      Hire a 13yo boy just to look at your products and point out all of the ways it can be badly interpreted

      • @pikmeir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        273 months ago

        They made a movie about that once with Tom Hanks. Guess these companies never watched it 😏

      • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        113 months ago

        I would argue that QA saves you money. In that, it detects faulty products and in doing so limit liability.

          • @Malfeasant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            The problem is QA vs QC. Quality control means you actually have to do stuff. Quality assurance just means “I assure you, the quality is good ;)”

        • gimpchrist
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 months ago

          If you don’t have a QA you run the risk of having to rebuild the entire bar from scratch

        • @XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          QC detects problems. QA predicts, mitigates, and resolves problems. QA is the first to go when it’s cheaper to scrap problems rather than make perfect product. QC goes when companies can outsource it to supplier-reported inspections and then leave it to the customer to act as final inspection. The Amazon method that everyone has to follow if they want to stay competitive

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      83 months ago

      Because that employee would be by far the most overworked one in most companies?

      Or maybe just because most companies don’t care as long as you keep giving them money without costing them any 🤷