To make matters worse, programmers in the study would often overlook the misinformation.

The research from Purdue University, first spotted by news outlet Futurism, was presented earlier this month at the Computer-Human Interaction Conference in Hawaii and looked at 517 programming questions on Stack Overflow that were then fed to ChatGPT.

“Our analysis shows that 52% of ChatGPT answers contain incorrect information and 77% are verbose,” the new study explained. “Nonetheless, our user study participants still preferred ChatGPT answers 35% of the time due to their comprehensiveness and well-articulated language style.”

Disturbingly, programmers in the study didn’t always catch the mistakes being produced by the AI chatbot.

“However, they also overlooked the misinformation in the ChatGPT answers 39% of the time,” according to the study. “This implies the need to counter misinformation in ChatGPT answers to programming questions and raise awareness of the risks associated with seemingly correct answers.”

  • OpenStarsEnglish
    511·
    6 months ago

    So it is incorrect and verbose, but also comprehensive and using a well-articulated language style at the same time?

    Also “study participants still preferred ChatGPT answers 35% of the time”, meaning that the overwhelming majority (two-thirds) did not prefer the bot answers over the human(e), correct ones, that maybe were not phrased as confidently as they could have been.

    Just say it out loud: ChatGPT is style over substance, aka Fox News. 🦊

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.devEnglish
      21·
      6 months ago

      ChatGPT is not good enough to use as a substitute for (whatever), but can be a useful tool for someone who can quantify its output.