• FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 days ago

    Oh yes, because the dems have an interest in this.

    (They could have fixed it. They didn’t.)

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 days ago

        When they had control of the house and senate. You remember all the whole “we could pack the court by expanding the seats” thing?

        They didn’t in part because of manchin and sinema being doucheburgers, but Biden was vocally opposed to it as well.

        • @TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          421 days ago

          They had control of the house but never the senate.

          You still have to overcome the fillabuster, and that takes 60 votes. And with Manchin and Sinema practically Republicans you’ll never be able to scrap that stupid rule.

              • FuglyDuck
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -221 days ago

                You didn’t see the part in my original comment where I recognized their obstinacy?

                Or the part where Biden was opposed to packing the courts anyhow?

                • @CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  521 days ago

                  Why would Biden publicly announce that he wants to pack the courts, and get all of the negative political consequences of that, while at the same time having a 0% chance of adding even one Justice, therefore getting absolutely none of the benefits?

            • TonyOstrich
              link
              fedilink
              321 days ago

              They had the majority in name only two of the Dems were almost more liberal Republicans and any attempt to force some of the more liberal legislation through was torpedoed by those two consistently.