Chicken wings advertised as 'boneless' can have bones, Ohio Supreme Court decides
apnews.com
The Ohio Supreme Court says consumers can't expect boneless chicken wings to actually be free of bones.
    • miz [any, any]English
      26•2 months ago

      The second stage is perversion of reality, where people come to believe that the sign is an unfaithful copy, which “masks and denatures” reality as an “evil appearance—it is of the order of maleficence”. Here, signs and images do not faithfully reveal reality to us, but can hint at the existence of an obscure reality which the sign itself is incapable of encapsulating.

  • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]English
    36•2 months ago

    This is stupid from every direction imaginable.

    Boneless doesn’t mean boneless? Oh, okay. Words don’t mean things anymore. Cool.

    But also, imagine inhaling your nuggies so fucking fast that you don’t notice a fucking bone in your mouth. Do you just not chew your food? Pour that slop right down my esophagus, fuck yeah.

    • yoink [she/her]English
      34•2 months ago

      plenty of people have problems chewing or digesting food, which is why they’d go for something softer and guaranteed to be safer like boneless chicken

      • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]English
        11•2 months ago

        You’re right, it’s ableist of me to criticize people for chugging meat like it’s a smoothie. I’m a bad comrade. There’s actually no other sources of protein that don’t have bones. beanis

        • yoink [she/her]English
          23•2 months ago

          people who are disabled, old people, people with textural issues

          but im glad you responded in good faith to what i was saying and found a way we can just dismiss them all beanis

          • carpoftruth [any, any]MEnglish
            9•2 months ago

            people who are disabled, old people, people with textural issues

            This is the carnist equivalent of a lib criticizing a communist for using a cell phone

            I’m not going to delete your carnist apologism but I’m also not going to act on your report of this post. There’s nothing in the story to suggest that the chicken bone guy is anything more than a bog standard meat eater. Don’t shelter carnist apologism with baseless accusations of ableism.

            • yoink [she/her]English
              14•2 months ago

              i’m sorry but maybe i’m not understanding - I’m not in any way defending carnism, hell im not even trying to defend the guy but the original commenter came out the gate about ‘nuggies’ and not digesting and chewing food and all i said is that some people have problems chewing or digesting food, which is why they might not chew or they might go for something without bones. As someone who works in healthcare and in aged care, i just thought it was worth piping up and saying that. They then responded to me, implying that I’m trying to call them ableist (which i never did in my first comment, so they’re jacketing me - i am literally just trying to make sure all angles are fairly considered) and that I’m trying to insinuate they’re a ‘bad comrade’ and then tying this to me defending carnism, which again I am not. and again i am not trying to defend this guy in any way. i get it if I misunderstood something here, but this genuinely feels like its coming at me for something im not trying to imply at all, but if I’m missing something I’m sorry

              edited to add: the reason the report says ‘doubling down on ableism’ is because i never brought up ableism, they did, and then in the next sentence dismissed me for calling them ableist, which again I never did, which seems to imply to me that they don’t care about ableism. maybe I’m wrong, I’d be willing to accept that, but again i never pulled any of these accusations first.

            • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]English
              3•2 months ago

              There’s nothing in the story to suggest that the chicken bone guy is anything more than a bog standard meat eater.

              they wouldn’t bother asking, why would such information be included unless the guy was literally an activist?

        • @LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
          7•2 months ago

          Meh. Just because he’s disabled doesn’t mean he doesn’t deserve to be happy and eat tasty food and not just vegan replacements.

    • EelBolshevikism [none/use name]English
      29•2 months ago

      If you don’t expect a fucking bone in your food and it’s suddenly there then it makes sense to inhale it on accident. Could happen to anyone even if they ate slowly

  • GnastyGnuts [he/him]English
    28•2 months ago

    For what it’s worth, vegan chicken nuggets are at a point now where they’re basically just better than real nuggets. They’ve got the taste down pretty close to real chicken, and the texture is better since there’s no gristle or nasty shit. Strong recommendation for MorningStar Farms as a baseline.

  • neo [he/him]English
    18•2 months ago

    this is the most down is up court ruling i’ve ever seen wtf

  • Crowtee_Robot [he/him]English
    17•2 months ago

    Boneless wings will now be just “wings” and typical wings will now be known as “extra boney”.

    • LocalOaf [they/them]English
      6•2 months ago

      lathe-of-heaven

      Astroturfed CHUD cultural war push to make Rogan dudebros who think soy makes you trans start thinking eating bone chips in your big boy nuggies makes you an alpha male brain genius