• Xip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    it seems like every other week i discover that a trait i have is actually an autistic trait. my mind was blown when i first found out that kids tip-toeing can be a sign of them being on the autism spectrum (i’m diagnosed with Asperger’s and i was a tip-toeing kid)!

    thankfully, i’m way too tired to read a potentially long paper. sorry, you would’ve been better without that manipulative title :(

    • DaGeek247@fedia.ioOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      The study is four pages long and is basically a survey with a couple different percentages of answers (autistic vs allistic) shown for the questions.

      The neat part I noticed was the difference between men and women was a way bigger effect on the question “do you ever view objects as having gender” than the 'tism did.

      • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, apart from it being based on a subjective questionnaire - I see that they used t test and chi square and some of the results were significant, but when you look at the table, very often the percentages don’t vary or vary very little. Ok, a group had 14% vs 15% of a trait and the difference is significant, but when you take a step back you got to be careful with overinterpretation. To me, the table was all over the place. And to be fair, 80 ND and 250 NT aren’t exactly a huge sample size either. All in all, while an interesting paper, I think there are severe limitations to its significance and definitely needs further (and more profound) analysis.

        But my being said, I am not from psychology studies, so maybe such approaches and numbers are more common? I’m from biomedical sciences and thus this reads more like a bachelor’s thesis.