• everyone_said@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a very poor take, and it is clear you didn’t even read the abstract before deciding the study is pointless. There is an obvious value in determing not just what traits are shared between autistic individuals and neurotypical individuals, but also determining the degree and intensity.

    To use your example, what if the study on drinking water showed they needed less water than an average person? Could that not be valuable, and lead to further research?

    This study identified an anomaly. Autistic people have trouble identifying with emotions in other people, but for some reason seem to have no problems doing so for objects. Isn’t that strange? Doesn’t that beg the further question of why? Great revelations in research are built on tiny stones like this.