• BraBraBra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No I’m not. Amazon doesn’t have a monopoly on creating video content. They do however have a right to exclusively show video content that they have the rights to.

    • Dźwiedziu@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      @BraBraBra
      Yes, you are. Especially that you’ve just left a specific context of copying a given video or given medical product for a very broad context of “Amazon doesn’t a monopoly on making videos”, that can’t be denied, and skipping the medical part.

      That’s Motte-and-bailey fallacy:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy

      So if Amazon has the right to exclusively sell you video then pharma can sell you exclusively gouge you for lifesaving drugs.

      Don’t get diabetes in 'murica if you have the chance.

      • BraBraBra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or, y’know… We can simply differentiate between video content and medince, since it’s not the same fuckin thing.

        Nope, you tried to extrapolate my argument outside of the specific context which I’m talking in, so I simply corrected the goalposts.