Fascists aren’t socialists. Jesus Christ. Rohm wanted social safety nets, he didn’t want the workers to control the means of production, he wanted a corporate state - because he was a fascist, not a socialist.
You’re confusing the left wing of a fascist party with the left wing.
On what planet does “socialism” refer exclusively to worker-owned means of production? That’s communism. Nobody uses socialism that way unless they’re manipulating wording to fit an agenda.
Socialism is a political philosophy and movement encompassing a wide range of economic and social systems which are characterised by social ownership of the means of production, as opposed to private ownership.
I have to break it to you, but that just as well describes state-owned companies. It has nothing at all to do with worker ownership. Your own definition makes Roehm a socialist lmao
moron. learn what private property means. fascism is not state ownership of corporations, it’s corporate ownership of the state, a very different dialectic.
Name-calling now? Keep eating those muffins buddy. It’s OK to admit you’re wrong once in a while.
Edit: directly from the horse’s mouth!
Erich Koch, who would eventually become the Gauleiter of East Prussia, maintained in an a 1931 article “Sind wir Faschisten?” that the key difference between Mussolini’s Fascist party and the NSDAP was that the former was capitalistic, while the later was socialist.
Fascists aren’t socialists. Jesus Christ. Rohm wanted social safety nets, he didn’t want the workers to control the means of production, he wanted a corporate state - because he was a fascist, not a socialist.
You’re confusing the left wing of a fascist party with the left wing.
On what planet does “socialism” refer exclusively to worker-owned means of production? That’s communism. Nobody uses socialism that way unless they’re manipulating wording to fit an agenda.
this planet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
it’s always amazing when people like you are SO CONFIDENTLY INCORRECT about basic information that can easily be determined with a simple search.
I have to break it to you, but that just as well describes state-owned companies. It has nothing at all to do with worker ownership. Your own definition makes Roehm a socialist lmao
moron. learn what private property means. fascism is not state ownership of corporations, it’s corporate ownership of the state, a very different dialectic.
Name-calling now? Keep eating those muffins buddy. It’s OK to admit you’re wrong once in a while.
Edit: directly from the horse’s mouth!
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/3vdkls/comment/cxn4p61/
fuck off nazi lover. make like your heroes and fucking die.
I hope you can get the help you need, friend. BTW see my edit to my previous post.
kill yourself. saves us the trouble of having to do it eventually.