• sunstoned@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    You would be obligated, if your goal were to be complying with the spirit and description of open source (and sleeping well at night, in my opinion).

    Do you have the source code and full data set used to train the “open source” model you’re referring to?

    • delirious_owl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean you would be legally obligated. You can sue someone who uses the GPL and doesn’t provide their sources.

      • sunstoned@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Do you plan to sue the provider of your “open source” model? If so, would the goal be to force the provider to be in full compliance with the license (access to their source code and training set)? Would the goal be to force them to change the license to something they comply with?