• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’d agree that taking the sample is unethical, but if you’re growing the steak from a sample someone else got or fucking it the ethical lines get really blurry.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              Idk, I don’t think they’re that blurry if we compare them to similar “conundrums” in other unethical circumstances.

              Like, would you think the same of someone owning child porn? They don’t distribute it, they don’t film the children themselves, they just own the recordings. The law says they’re a criminal, but it seems like a similar ethical conundrum - no? (To be clear, I think eating meat sourced from someone who did not consent is wrong. I hope that says enough about how I feel about CP.)

              How about owning the schematics for a ghost gun? You haven’t printed it, you haven’t distributed the schematic - you just own the schematic (and, for the purpose of the example, a 3d printer capable of printing the parts needed).

              Seems like the answer is “it’s unethical”. Gonna need a third party to weigh in.

        • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You aren’t seeing the big picture here…hear me out:

          TRUMP STEAKS, but the real deal this time!!!

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      nonconsensual meat grown from samples illicitly taken against someone’s will.

      Meat is already produced without consent and much more violently then taking samples.