• 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The real problem is that AI is ill defined and the goal posts move to “wherever we are now plus a little more” and is always not quite there yet. Writing a simple script to take input of user on cli and performing some action on behalf of them is arguably “AI” in that it automates a task that a human would otherwise have to do themselves.

    I think it’s probably a lot more useful to talk about a systems capabilities rather than its labels. Can this _ actually drive a car without human intervention? Can this _ actually write software without a coder looking over it and modifying the mistakes? For most domains, we aren’t there yet, where the thing is a human level (or better) autonomous agent.

    But i guess it’s no surprise that an industry that exists primarily on hype clings to its stockholder-edging labels and marketing terms.

    • ravhall
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Until i ask it a question and it complains about wage theft, im not gonna call it an AI.