• ArchRecord@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    3 months ago

    Claiming there’ll be a stock crash if someone is elected is not stock manipulation.

    If he made materially false statements, about a stock itself, deliberately meant to cause the economy to crash, then it would be a different story, but nothing he said was materially false, as he was just saying an elected candidate would be bad for the economy, in his opinion.

    It would be stock manipulation if he acted upon insider information to manipulate the stock price, or used proven, materially false statements about the reality of a company/stock to deliberately drive the stock down in price.

    • ravhall
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most of what he says can be disproven ☺️

      • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s not even entirely a matter of if what he said can be disproven in this case, because he didn’t even reference a specific stock.

        Speculating that the general market will go down, even if you use lies to say so, doesn’t count as stock manipulation.

        And even if he had singled out a specific stock, speculating on what would happen if an administration with opposing political views comes into office is not the same as saying, for instance, “the CEO of this company actually just stole 20 million bucks and it’s gonna tank valuations” while shorting the stock.