I figure I’ll vote PSL again like I did last time since they seem to be among the most principled leftist parties we have in this hellscape. I’ve seen a lot of support for Jill Stein but iirc she has some very weird reactionary conspiracy-brained views. How we feeling? Is supreme running this time around?

edit: to be clear I assume most of the based parties will not be on the ballot in most states, I’ve written in my picks before and I’ll do it again KKKopmala knifecat

  • hypercracker@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was honestly leaning toward voting for Kamala after the Walz pick but after that reichy ass convention and declaring their bottomless well of support for the zionist entity in no uncertain terms, it’s back to voting PSL in a swing state for me

    • TheDoctor [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I was waiting for discussions with the Uncommitted project to conclude. I’d been saying I’d vote for Kamala if she fully supported an arms embargo. And of course there was wishy washy messaging that she was considering it. But yeah the DNC speech made it clear that she’ll be continuing the Democrats’ fun little trick of doing Republican border policy and funding genocide in Palestine.

      surprised-pika, right?

  • corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think PSL is gonna make it on the ballot in my state, so im trying to decide between Lenin, Stalin, and Mao.

    Obvs for local shit it different but those are my presidential picks. Stalin is really irking me these days cause he just HAD to stop at Berlin :eye-roll:

  • IronJoe1984 [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    The owner of the local game store in my area is a green. So I have got to personally meet Dr.Stein, Ralph Nader, and Howie Hawkins. So I tend to vote green. However New York made it where parties have to cross a voting threshold in elections in order to remain on the ballot. This has made it so I have to vote green in every election.

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m planning to vote green because they’re more likely than PSL to hit a high enough vote count that people actually report on it, which is the most I can expect from my presidential vote.

    • puff [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s frustrating to me that third parties with mutual interests e.g. Palestine don’t form coalitions like the left did in France this last election. Yes, the left coalition in France has its problems, but they kept the far right and the liberal party away from outright power which is pretty astonishing. A Green/PSL/Other minor parties ticket dubbed ‘Palestine’ or ‘Workers’ or similar would at least stand a better chance of getting on the ballot in the first place, a threshold almost none of these parties are able to overcome.

  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If I was in a state where presidential elections mattered, I’d probably be at a toss up between PSL and the Greens, if I was in a state where presidential elections don’t matter (which I am) and gave a shit about presidential elections I’d probably vote for vermin supreme.

    That said I live in a state where presidential elections don’t matter anyways and I don’t really give a shit about presidential elections, so I’m not wasting energy on writing anyone in

  • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Was going to flip a coin between PSL and Green because there’s nobody else to vote for, or write myself in. IDK about Jill Stein’s reactionary views, what are they?

    • MiraculousMM [he/him, any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I just found that her NATOpedia article is surprisingly thorough on her positions. She claimed at one point that wifi signals damage peoples’ brains (that’s the main thing I was remembering) but waved it off later, and at one point was flirting with anti-vax stuff but seems to have backpedaled on that. She’s also staunchly anti-nuclear-power which seems silly though I’m not very informed about that subject. She’s way more based than I thought tbh but PSL is a better party

      • da_gay_pussy_eatah [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        The PSL is also anti nuclear, but in the “nuclear power is built on exploitation of mines in Africa” kind of way.

        Honestly, I saw an article recently that said China is building the equivalent of a nuclear plant every week in renewable energy, so nuclear seems kind of obsolete at this point anyway.

      • Black_Mald_Futures [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Everything I’ve ever heard Jill Stein say about stuff like vaccines has been skeptical of corporate manufacture and oversight and capture of regulatory agencies, not skeptical of vaccines themselves

        I wouldn’t be surprised if the wifi thing were similar, skepticism because, well, can you trust the companies making money off of wifi to do their due diligence in determining safety? (the answer is no, but that doesn’t mean wifi isn’t safe)