A Florida man is facing 20 counts of obscenity for allegedly creating and distributing AI-generated child pornography.

A Florida man is facing 20 counts of obscenity for allegedly creating and distributing AI-generated child pornography, highlighting the danger and ubiquity of generative AI being used for nefarious reasons.

Phillip Michael McCorkle was arrested last week while he was working at a movie theater in Vero Beach, Florida, according to TV station CBS 12 News. A crew from the TV station captured the arrest, which made for dramatic video footage due to law enforcement leading away the uniform-wearing McCorkle from the theater in handcuffs.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    15·
    2 months ago

    Allowing for victimless crimes simply because a group is undesirable is a terrible precedent.

    I wouldn’t even call it victimless, and we have all kinds of actual victimless crimes that are already illegal so I don’t care about supposedly setting this “precedent” that has already been set a million times over.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      61·
      2 months ago

      and we have all kinds of actual victimless crimes that are already illegal

      And we should be undoing those laws

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        14·
        2 months ago

        We aren’t though, so it’s frankly pretty odd that you’re fixated on this one.

        It’s frankly pretty odd that Lemmy in general seems to be fairly pro-generated-CSAM. I’m betting you guys are just afraid of the feds finding your stashes.

        EDIT: I basically get maybe three replies a week to things I post on here, except when I post something about being okay with generated CSAM or deepfake porn being illegal (in which case I get binders full of creeps in my inbox).

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          6·
          2 months ago

          There it is. “If you disagree with me you’re a pedo”. You people always go back to that. I bet I could convince you to hack off your own arm as long as I said anyone with a left arm is a pedo.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            14·
            2 months ago

            I bet you’ve never convinced anyone of anything ever.

            I’m not interested in going a hundred rounds with you on this. You haven’t made any convincing arguments at all; you’re making the type of shitty “anti-regulation” arguments that right libertarians have been making in bad faith in threads with me and others for decades.

            And all to what end?

            There’s nothing much to be gained by allowing this filth to be legal, and enforceability of important law to be lost.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              4·
              2 months ago

              There’s nothing much to be gained by allowing this filth to be legal

              Bootlickers throughout history.

              Rights are rights, and they should apply to everyone. Even the unsavory types.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                13·
                2 months ago

                Rights can have boundaries; freedoms can have restrictions. Take your toddler’s understanding of law, rights, freedoms, along with your don’t tread on me flag and kindly fuck off.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  4·
                  2 months ago

                  Freedom from thoughtcrime should have no restrictions. It should never be a crime simply to think or feel a certain way.

                  Victimless crimes should not be a thing. Anything that doesn’t harm anyone should be legal.