LinkedIn users in the U.S. — but not the EU, EEA, or Switzerland, likely due to those regions’ data privacy rules — have an opt-out toggle in their settings screen disclosing that LinkedIn scrapes personal data to train “content creation AI models.” The toggle isn’t new. But, as first reported by 404 Media, LinkedIn initially didn’t refresh its privacy policy to reflect the data use.
The terms of service have now been updated, but ordinarily that occurs well before a big change like using user data for a new purpose like this. The idea is it gives users an option to make account changes or leave the platform if they don’t like the changes. Not this time, it seems.
To opt out of LinkedIn’s data scraping, head to the “Data Privacy” section of the LinkedIn settings menu on desktop, click “Data for Generative AI improvement,” then toggle off the “Use my data for training content creation AI models” option. You can also attempt to opt out more comprehensively via this form, but LinkedIn notes that any opt-out won’t affect training that’s already taken place.
The nonprofit Open Rights Group (ORG) has called on the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the U.K.’s independent regulator for data protection rights, to investigate LinkedIn and other social networks that train on user data by default.
“LinkedIn is the latest social media company found to be processing our data without asking for consent,” Mariano delli Santi, ORG’s legal and policy officer, said in a statement. “The opt-out model proves once again to be wholly inadequate to protect our rights: the public cannot be expected to monitor and chase every single online company that decides to use our data to train AI. Opt-in consent isn’t only legally mandated, but a common-sense requirement.”
We are about to witness the most unbearable chatbot of all time.
An ex-Google, ex-Apple, leadership chatbot focused on improving outcomes with data and cat memes, hustling 24/7.
I think we might possibly see a kind of catastrophic event due to this quantity of hustling. The universe was not made for this.
What happens when the AI is trained on stuff that was made up to begin with?
Strangely it only tells the truth.
LinkedIn’s blog post on this isn’t at all apologetic, just “the privacy policy already let us do this but we’ve updated it to be clearer.” I was expecting them to say something accidentally went live early or there was some other mistake. Nope, it’s all according to plan. Fuck you LinkedIn.
The terms of service have now been updated, but ordinarily that occurs well before a big change like using user data for a new purpose like this. The idea is it gives users an option to make account changes or leave the platform if they don’t like the changes. Not this time, it seems.
They should be required to delete their training data and start over after people have had a chance to opt in.
This isn’t just in the US; I’ve got the setting in Canada and I’d assume it’s in just about any country where LinkedIn is available that isn’t on the very short list of exceptions.
If we can’t put the cat back in the bag, then the stolen data should be open-sourced and they should be regulated out of the AI space for a few years to allow companies not stealing data (I assume there are some) to catch up.
But if they didn’t get free resources, they wouldn’t be profitable!
Sadly that is the excuse many AI companies use.
I’m in the EU and that section in the settings isn’t even there. I guess they aren’t doing it here, for now at least. Probably due to GDPR.
So when do I get my $0.34 settlement check
Here’s where you opt out: https://www.linkedin.com/mypreferences/d/settings/data-for-ai-improvement
Thanks. I just checked the Advertising Preferences as well. Holy fuck the data they are collecting is insane.
Lol they say (location is Germany ) it’s not available in my region.
Because they have real data protections and MS knows it’s illegal. Funny how actually enforced regulations protect citizens.
I think a lot of these companies have been going ham because they know something is coming in the US and they want to do all their pillaging while it’s still technically legal and current, monetizable data.
Well fuck me haha
What’s the best way to salt your LinkedIn profile to provide bad data for GenAI improvements?
Clippy tips.
Get chatGPT to write the field values for you
Just write some content without no soul and not a shred of humanity present. I.e. use the platform as intended.
Just copy every post you find on something like LinkedIn Lunatics. Spread them out over the course of a certain interval of time since you’d hope they have spam filters, making sure to repeat the same things and continue adding stuff to the list. Do this for as many accounts as you are able to make.
Enough people do it and hopefully their AI would be constantly saying batshit things, hopefully, assuming the accounts don’t get blocked.
Enough people do it and hopefully their AI would be constantly saying batshit things
How would you be able to tell the difference?
I assume currently any AI they might be making would have some level of sanity to it and will give sane responses. So if enough people poison the data, the number of sane responses would probably go down if there’s more LinkedIn Lunatic type responses in the training data than normal responses.
Common EU win lol.
I feel your you dear US citizens.
I feel your you dear US citizens.
What are you feeling of theirs?
Pity for getting shafted by the corpos
When your first notification about the change is a Mastodon post telling you to look for a pre-checked checkbox that wasn’t there before…
Can’t wait for this comment to be scrapped by AI umbrella quiet cannon delve.
that does it, time to delete the account
I don’t think that necessarily means your data will be deleted and not used to train their LLMs, though.
you are probably right. Just deleted my account with 950 contacts, now they wont get new data any longer. linkedin wasn’t giving me any value anyways
It’s more about spite at this point
Fair enough, I respect that.
How am I supposed to take seriously an article that misuses a basic term like “scraping”?
Exactly my thought. LinkedIn didn’t scrape their own data.
%##% you *>#%* %##% piece of =^%# *>#%* ass *>#%* piece of =^%# %##% linkedin piece of =**^%#
Much like Facebook, if you participate in LinkedIn, I question your judgement.
