- cross-posted to:
- jingszo@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- jingszo@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Literally anything can prefict the election if you count random chance as prediction, yes.
“We assume monkeys were unaware of the identity, party affiliation, or policies of any of the candidates,” they wrote.
I fucking love this.
Some bold assumptions, if you ask me!
I give the best bananas, people say, nobody in the whole world gives better bananas than me 🍌, and when I give a banana, some assume, I don’t just give a banana, but see they’re coming, their (sic) rapists, and they’re not sending their best people, but when i flush the toilet it doesn’t work quite right and that’s why folks, that’s why when I give this monkey the best banana in the world, that’s why people don’t think it be like that but it do.
At this point I’m convinced that they are the only ones who can.
Well they’re gonna be voting in it, so why not?
Why not, they can almost write Dickens
Only 2 photos? “WhErE ArE ThE 3rD PaRtIeS?!!?”
AMAZING read. Like, in a Tommy Wiseau kinda way.
“That a … 65-year-old votes like a 5-year-old suggests that there is something in our genes that probably drives decisions,”
Well it suggests something alright. :-|
We’ve had two as presidents.
If W And Trump can win an election, they might be able to predict one as well.
I predict that it will either be Trump or Kamala… or someone else. So there, one just did.:-) 🙉
