I know there are lots of people that do not like Ubuntu due to the controversies of Snaps, Canonicals head scratching decisions and their ditching of Unity.

However my experience using Ubuntu when I first used it wasn’t that bad, sure the snaps could take a bit or two to boot up but that’s a first time thing.

I’ve even put it on my younger brothers laptop for his school and college use as he just didn’t like the updates from Windows taking away his work and so far he’s been having a good time with using this distro.

I guess what I’m tryna say is that Ubuntu is kind of the “Windows” of the Linux world, yes it’s decisions aren’t always the best, but at least it has MUCH lenient requirements and no dumb features from Windows 11 especially forced auto updates.

What are your thoughts and experiences using Ubuntu? I get there is Mint and Fedora, but how common Ubuntu is used, it seemed like a good idea for my bros study work as a “non interfering” idea.

Your thoughts?

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Every time this is asked, I post the same comment. I used Kubuntu for years and liked it, but more recently they started doing things that annoyed me. The biggest was related to snaps and Firefox. Now, sandboxing a browser is probably a great idea, but I wanted to use the regular deb install, so I followed the directions to disable the snap install and used the deb. However, Ubuntu overrode that decision several times - I’d start browsing, then realize I was using a snap AGAIN. Happened a few times over a couple years. If it happened once, eh, maybe an error, but it happened 3 or 4 times. I came to the conclusion I wasn’t in control of my system, Ubuntu was.

    I switched to Debian and am happy with my choice.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had the same experience on my one gui Ubuntu machine. I also have several headless machines, and due to some shared libraries I always ended up with snapd installed even though none of the packages I was running were installed through snap. I always found it through the mount point pollution that snapd does.

    • olympicyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why do you care if it’s a snap or a Deb? To me the biggest problem with snap is the pollution in /dev/loop*.

          • limelight79@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            The plugin works fine, but it can’t call the separate program if you have that installed.

            • olympicyes@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I use Mac most of the time and I’ve found that the functionality on Mac has largely started following how 1Password works on Linux. Meaning that the desktop app functions as a standalone app to modify your password records and the browser plugin allows you to access or lightly edit those records. Older versions would let you call the desktop app with a simple plugin but since I switched to the 1password.com version that’s no longer the case. If you’re on 1Password 7 then what you’re saying makes sense.

              As an aside, the function I use by far the most on Mac is command-shift-space to pop up a password search dialog that works very well. Not sure if that function exists on Linux.

              • limelight79@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Looks like I’m on 1password 8 in Linux. For whatever reason, I just prefer the app instead of having the browser pop open 1password.com to edit records. I don’t know why, it just bugs me. I know part of it is that I want to use the native app to show support for it.

                • olympicyes@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  I stand quite corrected. I learned a lot about native messaging on Ubuntu and understand where you’re coming from!

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The thing with Ubuntu / Canonical isn’t that it doesn’t work, it is that they’ve bad policies and by using their stuff you’re making yourself vulnerable to something akin to what happened with VMWare ESXi or with CentOS licensing - they may change their mind at some point and you’ll be left with a pile of machines and little to no time to move to other solution.

    For starters Ubuntu is the only serious and corporate-backed distribution to ever release a major version on the website and have the ISO installer broken for a few days.

    Ubuntu’s kernel is also a dumpster fire of hacks waiting for someone upstream to implement things properly so they can backport them and ditch their own implementations. We’ve seen this multiple times, shiftfs vs VFS idmap shifting is a great example of the issue.

    Canonical has contributing to open-source for a long time, but have you heard about what happened with LXD/LXC? LXC was made with significant investments, primarily from IBM and Canonical. LXD was later developed as an independent project under the Linux Containers umbrella, also funded by Canonical. Everything seemed to be progressing well until last year when Canonical announced that LXD would no longer remain an independent project. They removed it from the Linux Containers project and brought it under in-house development.

    They effectively took control of the codebase, changed repositories, relicensed previous contributions under a more restrictive license. To complicate matters, they required all contributors to sign a contract with new limitations and impositions. This shift has caused concerns, but most importantly LXD became essentially a closed-off in-house project of Canonical.

    Some people may be annoyed at Snaps as well but I won’t get into that.

    • turtle [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just wanted to add something for future reference of anyone reading your post: after Canonical did this, LXD was forked by Linux Containers into a new project named Incus.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t like snaps (nor flatpaks for that matter, they’re too big for my slow internet connection here in my Greek village). But I find it absolutely, 100%, crazy to install gimp and darktable via snaps, and not being able to print (the print option is just not there, because they’re snaps and somehow they haven’t implemented that for these apps). As an artist who sells prints, this makes the whole distro completely and utterly USELESS to me. Sure, they can be found as deb packages too, but they’re older. And Firefox is also sandboxed. And when I installed Chromium from the command line as a deb, it OVERWROTE my wish, and installed Chromium as a snap too.

    So, no ubuntu for me. The only advantage it has is that many third party apps (usually commercial ones) that release binary tarballs or appimages have tested with ubuntu and they usually work well (minus davinci resolve). I don’t have a big trouble with appimages as they’re generally smaller than the kde/gnome frameworks that flatpaks/snaps use, and they’re one file-delete away from getting rid of them completely. They’re just more straightforward.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, this kind of things drove me batty on Ubuntu. So many things were delivered as Snaps when they just don’t work that way. The funniest one to me was Filebot. It’s a media file naming/organizing tool…that doesn’t have disk access. Are you kidding me, Canonical?

      Flatpak is easier to work with, but has similar issues. Great for simple things, but I’m always worried that at some point I’m going to need some features that just won’t work, and then it’s going to be a hassle to migrate to a native installation. And it has no CLI support.

      And yeah, the bloat is wild. Deduplication on btrfs (or similar) helps but there’s no getting past the bandwidth bloat.

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, i hear you. I once installed the new version of snap (and later flatpak) of the gnome ide, and it couldn’t find the vala compiler, because it was outside the sandboxing. Totally useless.

        And yes, it’s bloated. Nothing works with less 1.6 gb of ram. But then again, it’s the same on fedora.

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I use Fedora Workstation, and that is not the case at all. I will agree that an Arch based distro will arguably give you much more control over everything, but to compare Fedora to Ubuntu? That’s just silly.

          • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I was talking about memory usage, not the rest of the stuff. Yes, Fedora uses as much RAM as Ubuntu.

            • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ah, that being the case, you’re also somewhat wrong. For the most part, Fedora actually uses a bit more RAM and resources than Ubuntu.

        • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I forget the exact terminology but I tried putting it into the most permissive mode available. Is still could not work with external hard drives. This was several years ago so I can’t say what might have changed since then, but I did spend some time troubleshooting and at the time that functionality did not work. I’d read that it was possible in the previous version (maybe 18.04?)

          Edit: Come to think of it, it might not have been as simple as “couldn’t access external drives”. It might have had something to do with how my disks were mounted and their permissions and mount points. I remember that I hit a wall at some point and further troubleshooting would have required more surgery on my system than I was willing to attempt.

          • olympicyes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Snaps call your atypical drive arrangement “removable media” so even if you saw it, it might have been counter intuitive. This is what you would’ve needed to run:

            sudo snap connect filebot:removable-media
            

            Since 23.10 setting snap permissions has been easier in the gui.

    • Molten_Moron@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      And when I installed Chromium from the command line as a deb, it OVERWROTE my wish, and installed Chromium as a snap too.

      This right here is my issue with Ubuntu. A huge part of Linux for me is that I am in control of my OS and machine. If I use apt to install a package, it’s because I want the .deb version. I absolutely don’t need my OS telling me “I know what you asked for, but I’m going to give you the snap version anyway”.

      I could see snaps being preferred over .debs in the Software app, sure (though they shouldn’t be the only option). But replacing apps in a command line tool is garbage.

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        As far as the software app goes, I like how Mint handles it: it clearly marks what’s a system install and what’s a Flatpak, and if both are available it makes it easy to select which one you want. At no point does it try to hide or obfuscate it.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thanks for giving me a shot at a woke moment now

        That was racist. There is nothing wrong with worshiping Olympian gods. You are a right-wing-conservative-republican-christian-homophobic-misogonistic-white-supremacist-rapper-patriarch.

        Lol, I honestly don’t know how woke people manage to find all this crap on any comments, and you just saw me try 🤣🤣🤣

    • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What sort of printers do you make your prints with? And do you print directly from GIMP or from something else? I’ve been trying to set up a FOSS printing workflow using Canon giclee printers, which has been mostly successful but I haven’t yet figured out how to print custom sizes on roll paper, only standard sizes on sheet paper.

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use sheet paper to be honest on an Epson printer. I do use Gimp to print, although most of my editing is happening on Photopea in the browser (gimp didn’t cut it for me as an editor for my paintings, I needed adjustment layers and Secondary Colors). Then, I export a JPEG, and print from Gimp (because the browser doesn’t have all the printing options that gimp has). I use the Debian-Testing rolling release.

  • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m old and my gateway to Linux was Ubuntu 5.10 via a live CD they gave me at uni back in 2006.

    I got to experience it when they used to take seriously their “Linux for human beings” motto.

    Those were GNOME 2 and kernel 2.x times. Albeit the limitations of the technology (40GB HDD disk, 256 MB RAM, an Intel Xeon processor which I can’t remember it’s exact specs) it felt way snappier (no pun intended) than Windows. You could felt they cared about it in that brown visual theme, the icons, the sounds, the way the documentation was phrased - you could feel the Ubuntu in it.

    I ended wiping my entire docs drive while trying to install it but got to learn lots of stuff and feel like my computer was actually mine.

    Same as for many people my generation, I switched to Linux thanks to that Ubuntu. It’s really sad what it has become and the poor, selfish decisions they have taken, but still it keeps holding a special place in the Linux memories.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Absolutely. I hate Ubuntu now, but Karmic Koala was my gateway drug. I was scared of partitioning so wubi meant I could still try it out.

      Then Unity happened and I no longer cared for Ubuntu.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ubuntu is not terrible and if it works for you then fine. I would be surprised if Debian or Mint didn’t also work for you just as well though.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Debian can be annoying if you want to install a newish version of something from the package manager. It’s why I can’t use APT to keep Rust up to date and have to use Rustup instead, for an example.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think Ubuntu made sense back in the day when Debian wasn’t as user-friendly.

    Now that Debian is, it looks like Ubuntu is trying really hard to just be as commercialized as possible.

    I still don’t understand the logic behind their paying for updates for certain programs when Debian doesn’t require it.

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think Ubuntu made sense back in the day when Debian wasn’t as user-friendly.

      This is a very good point.

      When Ubuntu launched, it was a big moment for linux. Before then, setting up a linux GUI was a lot of pain (remember setting modelines for individual monitors and the endless fiddling that took - and forget about multiple monitors). Ubuntu made GUI easy - it just worked out of the box for most people. It jumped Linux forwards as a desktop a huge way and adoption grew a lot. They also physically posted you a set of CDs or a DVD for free! And they did a bunch of stuff for educational usage, and getting computers across Africa.

      That was all pretty amazing at the time and all very positive.

      But then everyone else caught up with the usability and they turned into a corporate entity. Somewhere along the way they stopped listening to their users, or at least the users felt they had no voice, and a lot more linux distros appeared.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    The distribution is fine, maybe even good.

    The politicking and project management around the distro has annoyed a lot of people.

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ubuntu does work and is a decent distro in many ways. The problems are around how canonical leverages things for its own financial benefit for the detriment of users and the Linux community.

    A good example is Snap. It is forced on users - even Firefox is a snap on Ubuntu. This is not an efficient way fo end users to run their system or their most used software.

    Instead of making the builds available as standard software, users have to use the Snap or go hunting elsewhere for builds. That’s anti-user and is identical to how Microsoft behaves with windows. It doesn’t do things to benefit users, it does things to benefit Microsoft.

    It’s arguable whether what snap does is actually worth the overhead - I can see that it is more secure in many ways. But then so it Flatpak, and that is more universally used for desktop software across Linux distros. Snap has some inherent benefits for server side use but then why force it on end users where it is not as good as Flatpak in many ways? Or Appimage?

    So Ubuntu is fine in many ways, but why bother when you can go for alternatives and give the best of both worlds? Mint is an Ubuntu based distro without snap and other canonical elements. I used mint for ages, it’s great and there is a reason it’s so popular.

    I’ve moved on to OpenSuSE now but the Ubuntu ecosystem is fine, it works well for many, and it’s very well documented and supported which often works downstream in Mint and others. It’s just Ubuntu itself thats a bit crappy due to the decisions made to suite canonical rather than what users want or would suit them best. In the end it all comes down to personal choice and what people are willing to accept from their distro.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    For me, Mint offers everything good about Ubuntu without any of the bad.

    That being said, I don’t hate it, but I also don’t recommend it ever to people. The pitfalls that can come up from Snaps, plus the default layout of Gnome, are reasons why a brand new Linux user might struggle with it unless they are already somewhat of a techie.

    For ex-windows users like my parents who aren’t tech savvy, I just install Mint, set up their shortcuts and desktop icons, and away they go, happy little penguins.

  • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ubuntu isn’t terrible, there are just bad things on Ubuntu that aren’t present in other distros.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah I don’t hate Ubuntu, I used it as my daily driver for years, but it did get a bit frustrating how they seem to fixate on the new ‘shiny’ thing (Unity, Mir, the whole convergent desktop thing, now Snaps) and chase after it while other things are left to stagnate, then they seem to get it to where it’s almost good, then drop it and go chasing off after something else.

      Also, I find that these days there are just better options for a ‘just works’ kind of distro (like Mint or Pop!OS) so I don’t hate Ubuntu, I just have no particular need for it anymore.

  • SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Ubuntu was a successful attempt to make Debian user-friendly. If you don’t remember Linux in 2003, it took a lot of time to configure.

    Ubuntu came along and did everything automatically from first install. Some of the polish it had was things like smooth fonts, TrueType font support (remember old XFree86 Bitmap fonts?) a GUI installer, automatically detecting your monitor resolution, setting up sound automatically, and automatic downloading of firmware needed to make your hardware work. In just one reboot after install, you had a usable system that looked really nice, with smooth fonts.

    In 2024, Debian already does all of this out of the box. The value add of Ubuntu is minimal. Ubuntu provides a theme, a splash screen when booting up, a custom font, and a modified version of the Dash to Dock extension that you can just download yourself from the Gnome extension site. That’s it. One might argue that snaps make Ubuntu worse than Debian.

    Just use Debian. If you want a somewhat more polished system (nice cursors, unique icons, easy to configure animations), there is Mint Debian edition.

    It takes less time to just set up Debian to look and behave like Ubuntu (about 10 minutes) than it takes to continually fight against Ubuntu snaps.

    Just use Debian.

  • bitwolf@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The thing is. Snaps isn’t the first controversy.

    Canonical, with Ubuntu early on was helping drive things forward, but they reached a point where they started to do things their own way with disregard to the broader ecosystem.

    Each time they did this, they cause fragmentation, struggled, and then deferred to the choice the rest of the ecosystem has. The problem with this is that they’re not sharing their effort, they’re just throwing it away.

    They merely doubled down hard on snaps which is the latest controversy.

    Snaps have their own advantages, but Canonical owns the store. Which becomes its own stalewort

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same, I was very sad wheb they gave up in Unity8. I do check in often on the project as I felt it provided a very good mobile experience.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Personally I don’t consider it a con unless rampant. However in many cases they’ve dumped the projects. It is effort that could have helped along another project.

        imo the negative side effect is the wasted effort and the abandonment.

      • erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Packages for third party apps is the one place we don’t want fragmentation.

      • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think there are good kinds of fragmentation (choice and/or competition) and many bad kinds/causes of fragmentation (clinging to abandonware, reinventing the wheel, rejecting reasonable changes, “rewrite it in X-lang”, demanding complete control, style/design choices that don’t actually matter…)

  • BelatedPeacock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    In all reality it’s fine. Snaps are annoying on occasion, and the Amazon search integration was rightly riffed on, but it’ll work like anything else. Sometimes it’s just funny to riff on Ubuntu, and sometimes people hate on it because Linux people are very … er … um … opinionated. But if it works best for you then go for it.

  • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The Term

    The issue is that, no Ubuntu is not “the Windows” of Linux.

    First of all this statement makes no sense. You could say “the Samsung of the Android world” as Samsung Android is a Distribution that looks nice and many people think it is nice to use (leaving out that it is the most spyware-riddled software on locked devices with horrible customer treatment)

    Windows is just one OS. Android is an easy variant of Linux, and Ubuntu was one too.

    Nowadays, uBlue Aurora/Bazzite would be my “best Desktop Linux”, because they implement all the great, easy and modern stuff of Fedora Atomic Desktops, while also removing stupid opinionated things, and adding packages they legally simply cannot ship.

    Updates & Upgrades

    Ubuntu is not easy anymore. Distro upgrades are a mess and break. I had 12 laptops, all had the same 3 issues and updates took forever.

    Ubuntu requires a sudo account for them to even work, a nonsudoer gets an update message but clicking it does nothing.

    I.e. they dont use polkit, unlike Fedora for example.The paradigm of

    1. Needing a user with sudo rights to use a system, otherwise an admin needs to login every week and do the GUI updates
    2. Updates and upgrades being a privileged action that requires root permission

    Is just bad. Android works without root since forever, and I would say it is the easiest Linux distro out there.

    Style

    They have their own strange icons, which look worse than GNOMEs. They have their own strange store instead of using and improving GNOME Software.

    Their design sucks in comparison to Manjaro if you ask me. Most personal point of this list. Many other Distros just ship GNOME, do the packaging and leave the Branding to small changes, and the upstream DE.

    Snaps

    Snaps are not cross platform, while Flatpak exists and is cross platform.

    Ubuntu doesnt even have uptodate flatpak and dependencies in their repos so the Flatpak project maintains like 6 PPAs just to run them on Ubuntu.

    Snaps are not cross platform because they rely on AppArmor for sandboxing, and afaik custom AppArmor patches that are not in upstream.

    This means Snaps on Fedora and others would run Snaps unsandboxed.

    Technically they are fine. Pretty normal approach. But their repo hat big malware issues and they only allow a single one, which is a total nogo for any opensource project.

    Snaps installed by other users with sudo cannot be opened by other users. You need to install them per-user, no other option possible.

    Flatpak requires wheel/sudo too, I need to make a Fedora Change request to fix that, my previous one got rejected…

    Variants & LTS

    They only ship KDE on the LTS variant, which means by now it is very outdated. KDE is the most windows-like desktop, and also has the most features, by far. I tried GNOME and made a writeup on Fedora discuss.

    Bloat

    They bloat (at least) their (LTS) variants with tons of deb packages.

    Safety & Snapshots

    They dont integrate timeshift or other backup systems. Linux Mint and OpenSUSE are better here. Fedora Atomic Desktops too, while traditional Fedora not.