Description: A meme with the caption “Okay so that was trolley problem version number 7. Janeway opted to run over five Tuvixes instead of one EMH.” Below is a picture of the inside of a trolley with Janeway smiling and covered in gore. Michael and Eleanor from The Good Place are on either side of her. Michael is taking notes and Eleanor is amazed.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    She made the right call, even considering the EMH is a hologram and thus wouldn’t be harmed by a trolley.

      • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        We all know Evil Dead II is the best. AOD is full on silly, but I enjoy it through the lens of a demented Looney Tunes fan. Rise was mediocre. The 2013 remake was ok, though all it did was retell the same old story with updated cinematography and unnecessary CGI.

  • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I mean imo the most ethical thing to do in the trolly problem is to do nothing. Let it do what it was going to do before you were there.

    • AceBonobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You have the option of killing 5 people or killing 1 person and you just let it go ahead and kill 5 people?

      I’m going to disagree that you found a solution.

      Some things in life don’t have solutions, only compromises.

      • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The trolley problem decision is entirely dependent on the amount of detail that’s provided.

        What if the 5 people are 5 Jeffrey Dahmers, and the 1 person is Mr Rogers? What if those 5 Dahmers had been reformed and had spent the past 20 years in selfless charitable service to orphans, and the Mr Rogers was 98 and expected to live only a few more months?

        You can twist the conditions endlessly to sway the decision either way; however, I tend to agree with you: if you’re given only the most basic information, the best choice is to save the most people.

        If you choose not to decide,
        You still have made a choice.
        
        • teft@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s also dependent on what type of moral philosophy you subscribe to. A strict utilitarian will answer differently than someone who practices Kantian deontology.

          • Very true. I think Buddhists might agree with the top comment that the only moral action in this case is no action.

            That’s why, despite being a trite, overused topic whicha and any serious philosopher cringes at whenever it’s brought up, I think it’s a pretty interesting situation, where the answer says a lot about the responder. But it’s been beaten to death, and I’m sure professionals are sick of hearing about it.