I kind of want to get the communities feeling on leaving registrations open. Do you want them to stay open, or do you think it was better when they were approval only?

Marking this post as NSFW, so only logged-in accounts can see it.

  • mcuglys@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Saw a guy on reddit just the other day say signing up is too hard lol. I’m not sure what stopped him.

  • Cunnysseur@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The instance feels a lot more active and I noticed the user count went from ~900 at the start of open to 1.8k now. I like having open registration over approval as long as it’s not straining the servers or something.

    • RA2lover@burggit.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We’ve had around 400 new posts and 800 new comments since (~25% increase in total). Most of the activity seems to have been due to around a dozen very active users seeding new communities, though.

  • mabtheseer@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see no issue with open registration. I haven’t seen any bad folks around in the last few days, so I’m assuming either we haven’t attracted bad folks or the mods have taken care of any issues.

  • SmolSlime@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t even know you changed the registration. It still feels the same to me here. Not sure if that’s a good thing or not.

  • Nazrin@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it makes sign up instructions easier if you want to advertise. Nothing kills the mood for some people like explaining why you want to go on the loli friendly instance.

    • monerobull@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if i think it is a good idea, uncalled for shilling ahead:

      Spoiler

      Yall should consider integrating Monero micropayments into your registration process, works really great on monero.town People scan a qr code (embedded on registration via markdown) or paste the address into their wallet and in the application question they post the transaction ID. No awkward coming up with an answer and it contributes to keeping the instance alive. While people who break rules can just buy access again, if they constantly misbehave they are just giving you more coins 🤷‍♂️

      Please don’t be mad if you think crypto is garbage, i respect that and that’s why there’s a spoiler tag 😅

      • Nazrin@burggit.moe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing kills the mood more than hooking up a bank account to a crypto bank so that you can buy monaro so that you can log in to the loli friendly instance.

      • Disa@burggit.moeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that’s pretty cool that you have it set up that way over there! Not something we would do, though.

        We do accept Donations in Monero (and other crypto too.) and I think that’s about as much as we’re going to go. I can’t see locking registration behind crypto donation being anything but a huge pain for people, and it’d probably only hurt us, especially since we’re heavily defederated.

  • RA2lover@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haven’t seen a significant jump in user activity during that period despite the increase in accounts (from ~1.33 to ~1.8k over the open registration period), but can’t comment further without additional data points that wouldn’t be a good idea to make public (or even collect in some cases).

    The number of communities has increased noticeably (98?->116) and there’s been a slight increase in weekly active users (125->143) which doesn’t quite completely match the increase in account creations.

    I don’t know whether this is due to people who don’t share the values of the instance (enough to fail manual approval) signing up, then abandoning their accounts once they realize the consequences of those values, users signing up and actively using their accounts but not making posts/comments, some actor creating sleeper accounts to use for nefarious purposes at some point in the future, or something else.

    Overall this week has been positive but i can’t find enough evidence to argue it wouldn’t have been without open registrations, and i haven’t seen anything that warrants limiting registrations once again.

    • mcuglys@burggit.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      As the content trends towards “mostly porn” I think you’re going to see the lurker ratio go up. Especially from people who worry that lolis might be legal trouble in their jurisdiction, or have simply been on reddit so much they assume whatever gets banned on reddit MUST be able to get them in trouble somehow (surprisingly common and disturbing opinion with regard to the younger generations views on free speech).

    • OrcishOatmeal@burggit.moe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been thinking about this, I believe one factor is the current app situation, I realised last night that the iOS apps I’m using to browse Lemmy can’t post at all!

  • rinkan 輪姦@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only bad thing I noticed didn’t have to do with open registration. It was a bot commenter from a federated instance.

    Is registration at least protected by CAPTCHA? Or is it completely open?

    • Disa@burggit.moeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is registration at least protected by CAPTCHA? Or is it completely open?

      We have Captcha enabled and set to medium difficulty. We initially set it to hard, but hard was, like, unreadable even for a human (at least for me, a visually impaired human) so we set it to medium instead.

  • Pink Bow@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My feelings might be in conflict with the available evidence. I preferred the instance being approval only (but I also assume that also created a large admin burden, which is an important consideration).

    Once approval was lifted I expected a bunch of disruption… however at least in the communities I’m following that hasn’t happened. Perhaps my fears were unfounded. If anything, it seems like conversation has potentially lessened at is late (or maybe the level is actually the same or even increased, but just split into more or different communities now?).

    In any case, while I still like the idea of approvals being required, if I’m trying to be rational, maybe they weren’t actually providing much value compared to the effort that was required?

    • Disa@burggit.moeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that approvals were very important once we were establishing the culture, but I think now that the culture is established things are running smoothly. The major issue with approvals is the lack of feedback as to whether you have been approved or not (since we don’t have an email server and don’t require email). So people just had to check back occasionally to log in and just cross their fingers to hope they were approved.

      We’re not against setting things to approval only again if we feel that open registrations start to cause problems. For now, though, it seems like things are running fairly smoothly, even with open registrations.