RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agoData center emissions likely 662% higher than big tech claims.www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1147arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.onlinenews@lemmy.worldclimate@slrpnk.netclimate@slrpnk.net
arrow-up1146arrow-down1external-linkData center emissions likely 662% higher than big tech claims.www.theguardian.comRedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: worldnews@lemmit.onlinenews@lemmy.worldclimate@slrpnk.netclimate@slrpnk.net
minus-squarecelsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 month agodeleted by creator
minus-squaremachiabelly [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoWith the way they phrased it its wrong. 662% higher than is 7.62x About 662% (of) is 6.62x
minus-squareAmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month ago662% is 6.62 but an increase of 662% is 7.62 to show a 62% increase you multiple a number by 1.62, to show a 162% increase it’s 2.62, etc (262 is 162% more than 100) i’m not a math guy don’t @ me
minus-squareTankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoYou got it exactly!
minus-squareTankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 month ago“662% higher than” is equal to 762% (7.62 times). “7.62 times higher” equals 862%.
minus-squareUmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoYeah, seems correct but just oddly phrased.
deleted by creator
With the way they phrased it its wrong.
662% higher than is 7.62x
About 662% (of) is 6.62x
662% is 6.62 but an increase of 662% is 7.62
to show a 62% increase you multiple a number by 1.62, to show a 162% increase it’s 2.62, etc (262 is 162% more than 100)
i’m not a math guy don’t @ me
You got it exactly!
“662% higher than” is equal to 762% (7.62 times).
“7.62 times higher” equals 862%.
Yeah, seems correct but just oddly phrased.