• systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not be happy both OS options exist? Both have a place and a use and in various ways an ease of use

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Linux with 100% market share can’t monopolize the entire market because it doesn’t have a centralized distro

        You see similar to Google with Redhat/Canonical. If everyone was with them then it would be a problem

        • s_s@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Linux with 100% marketshare means nothing.

          GPL is designed to protect developer rights, not user rights.

          If google packaged your linux distro and sold it through the play store bundled with their own apps and sandboxed everything and called it chromeOS, your rights would not be any better protected.

          Security and privacy involves users making informed choices to protect themselves, full stop.