mox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 5 hours agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down10cross-posted to: cpp@programming.dev
arrow-up162arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox@lemmy.sdf.org to Programming@programming.dev · 5 hours agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: cpp@programming.dev
minus-squareTroy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 hours agoDon’t get me wrong. There is still a time and a place for Fortran. And this will also likely always be the case for C++. But I’m not sure it is entirely wise to choose it if you’re creating a new project anymore.
minus-squareClay_pidgin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 hour agoI’m barely competent at programming. What is the use case for Fortran, besides maintaining ancient code?
Don’t get me wrong. There is still a time and a place for Fortran. And this will also likely always be the case for C++. But I’m not sure it is entirely wise to choose it if you’re creating a new project anymore.
I’m barely competent at programming. What is the use case for Fortran, besides maintaining ancient code?