• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is this going to be like UBI studies, where the news pretends every one of hundreds of studies is the one that is breaking this news for the first time? My economics professor was taking the piss out of supply side economics over a decade ago.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Endorsement of trickle-down is usually made for the same reason as criticisms of UBI… Conservative voters are ignorant of the concept of elasticity in economics, and their politicians know it.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not to mention that economics education is even worse than civics education. At best someone who went to college might have gotten a 100 level microeconomics course as part of their degree. But I don’t know of any school that teaches about money beyond maybe how to set a budget. If you’re lucky.

        When normal people talk about “the economy” it’s largely based on their own bank account and how they feel other people are doing in comparison to some subjective standard, not anything to do with actual economics. This is why we keep having to raise the debt ceiling and politicians talk about it like it’s getting another credit card.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Some people are either unaware or like being trickled upon. Somehow there still seems to be widespread support for tax cuts to the wealthy. Somehow people seem to remember “tax cut” while either being unaware or not remembering whose taxes were cut. Somehow they already forgot when Warren Buffet made a big deal of his tax rate being lower than his secretary’s and that we should fix that. As recently as this summer I found someone surprised that the Trump tax “cuts” increased my taxes

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        The goldfish memory of news organizations doesn’t help. If they reported this accurately it would be, “Another Study Confirms Trickle Down Doesn’t Work”

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      No. It doesn’t seem to me that the article pretends this one study is breaking any news for the first time. It cites other studies and individuals that have expressed the same idea for a long time. Possibly this is the first rigorous study of the 50 years from 1965 to 2015, I dunno.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        This is what’s before the fold. Combined with the headline, most people are not going to come away with the sense that this is a long known thing.

        Tax cuts for the wealthy have long drawn support from conservative lawmakers and economists who argue that such measures will “trickle down” and eventually boost jobs and incomes for everyone else. But a new study from the London School of Economics says 50 years of such tax cuts have only helped one group — the rich.

        The new paper, by David Hope of the London School of Economics and Julian Limberg of King’s College London, examines 18 developed countries — from Australia to the United States — over a 50-year period from 1965 to 2015. The study compared countries that passed tax cuts in a specific year, such as the U.S. in 1982 when President Ronald Reagan slashed taxes on the wealthy, with those that didn’t, and then examined their economic outcomes.

        When it does get into it below the fold it talks about the pandemic. When it could talk about how we’ve known this for literal decades. (I love the second one. It’s six years after Reagan is elected and written by a pro-trickle down economist whose having to move the goal posts to keep defending it.)