SelfProgrammed@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agoHow dare you...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square235fedilinkarrow-up11.79Karrow-down144
arrow-up11.75Karrow-down1imageHow dare you...lemmy.worldSelfProgrammed@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square235fedilink
minus-squareZeon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down19·2 days agoWas he actually convicted of that though?
minus-squarebitjunkie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down2·2 days agoIt wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
minus-squareNateNate60@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·2 days agoThe civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.
minus-squareUnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 days agoMy experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past. So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoOnly a civil case, not a criminal conviction.
minus-squaremichaelmrose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 hours agoIt means a judge found that enough evidence existed to conclude he more likely than not raped as opposed to beyond a shadow of a doubt same standard of proof as If I did it OJ
Was he actually convicted of that though?
It wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
The civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.
My experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past.
So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
Only a civil case, not a criminal conviction.
It means a judge found that enough evidence existed to conclude he more likely than not raped as opposed to beyond a shadow of a doubt same standard of proof as If I did it OJ