Social media platforms like Meta and X (formerly Twitter) tolerate a wide range of content but restrict public tracking of celebrities’ private jet routes, citing privacy concerns.

Meta suspended accounts run by Jack Sweeney, who used public data to track jets of prominent figures like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, highlighting privacy risks for powerful individuals.

The article points out the irony of Meta’s selective privacy enforcement, given its ongoing issues with protecting users from harmful content like disinformation and predatory behavior.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 months ago

    What a billionaire wants them to stop doing something they send a legal team after them and make them pay money to defend themselves…

    When us pleebs what them to stop doing something it actually cost them more money to have somebody make someone stop than it does to ignore us

  • object [Object]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wonder if data brokers get info on billionaires too. Let’s normalize exposing everything billionaires do by buying their data, and presenting it to the world

    • mx_smith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh yes, they have lists of famous people whose data is removed, in fact the big data company I used to work for had a whole team dedicated to keeping these lists updated.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I have reported so much stuff on Facebook, including obvious harassment where someone did multiple posts just abusing people

    It never gets removed.

    But my post telling people where I could be found in the mountains when hiking was for cybersecurity or whatever (in case I disappeared I made this post).

    Facebook has turned to complete shit, to the point after 30 years, i wish there was a better alternative

  • CrazyFrog97
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Luckily we have spaces such as the Fediverse where we can escape CorpoNet.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s… Incitement to violence, pretty sure that’s banworthy everywhere since it’s actually illegal.

      It would be equally illegal to say ‘kill the poor’, ‘kill <some racial group>’, or ‘kill fans of the big bang theory’, though obviously nobody would object to the latter.

          • ravhall
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Good luck with that status quo.

            • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can have steady change without radical change, that’s why we don’t have child labor anymore.

              The problem is people get complacent and then horrible assholes break everything behind the scenes.

              When things look like they’re going well, that’s when you know the game is being fixed.

              • ravhall
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                If you don’t think we have child labor, you haven’t read the news. And if you haven’t read the news, you wouldn’t realize we need radical change.

      • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Great. I’ll join in on the incitement of violence against those raping us out of our very existence.

        Kill them all.