• Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      [ten paragraph treatise on shit that had little relevance to the point]

      Least smug pseudo-intellectual socialist.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        ten

        If you’re having trouble with numbers, try using your fingers. Hint: you only need one hand.

        • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          If you’re having trouble understanding what an exaggeration is- I’d suggest you read your own rhetoric for a quick refresher.

          Maybe you’ll understand how the rest of us feel having to read that nonsense.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Sorry, I’m not going to read the twenty paragraphs you just wrote, my brain gets all hurty when I try to engage with something longer than ten characters. I’m still definitely very informed and worth listening to though!

            • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              twenty

              If you’re having trouble with numbers, try using your fingers. Hint: you only need one hand.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                If you’re having trouble understanding what an exaggeration is- I’d suggest you read your own rhetoric for a quick refresher.

                Really walked right into that one, huh?

                • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  I walked into nothing, bud. You’re getting called out. That’s all I’m here for. I’m giving you the spotlight to show everyone what you’re about.

                  And it’s working spectacularly!

                  In case you’re not following the jist:

                  Your original smug comment was intended to illustrate the fault in my exaggeration- I threw that right back at you. You then responded with my response thet called you out- thereby admitting that your smug comment was utter trash.

                  Thanks for playing along.