• JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    So they’d rather have a president who would support a genocide even more. Seems like a great decision.

    Also, there were other issues at play in this election. Even Bernie Sanders said so

    • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Lol no “they’d” rather have a president who doesn’t materially support genocide, but seems like that wasn’t something people were allowed to vote for.

      • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        In other words they didn’t want to chose the lesser evil so they were fine with either option

        Amazing decision.

        • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Or, it could mean they weren’t fine with either option? “We’re not quite as evil as the other guy” isn’t the campaign slogan you seem to think it is.