• BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That might have been in the footnotes of the DNC platform, but Kamala said none of that.

    Here’s a quote from Stephen Semler’s newsletter:

    For example, in this video clip, Stephen Colbert asks Harris, “Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be and what would stay the same?” Harris replies: “Sure. Well, I mean, I’m obviously not Joe Biden. So that would be one change. But also I think it’s important to say with 28 days to go, I’m not Donald Trump.”

    First, that doesn’t answer the question. Second, that description applies to literally everyone except for Joe Biden and Donald Trump. This is the quality of candidate you get when the Democratic Party chooses one for you.

    https://www.stephensemler.com/p/a-couple-charts-to-explain-a-harris?publication_id=37298&post_id=151256232>>

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      When it was being discussed who would replace Biden before he dropped out, many black abd female voters were pissed it was even up for discussion considering Kamala was the vice president. They saw it as her job to be next in line after Biden.

      If someone else was chosen all those votes would’ve been lost and we would still have lost.

      • BlueMacaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        Since we lost anyways, I would have preferred to have an actual primary process, even if it was a very abbreviated one at the convention. Destroying democracy to save democracy never made sense to me.