Did I miss any? I probably missed some.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    COVID means everyone needs to work less, that means that every product that is a result of people’s work decreases in availability, and thus, increases in cost.

    This is a fundamental aspect of any major disruption, including the war in Ukraine, that will drive up prices.

    The problem that Democrats and most Liberal governments have is that they just let this happen. The reality of the situation is that the poorer you are, the more of your money goes to necessities, so when the price of necessities rises, the more of your money is lost to inflation. If you only spend 10% of your income on necessities and the rest goes to frivolous things, then you can just cut back on them no big deal, you can shift that money to investments and actually profit off the inflation. But if 90% of your money goes to necessities, than you have no choice and 90% of your money just got less valuable.

    Inflation is a frustrating and abstract word that just hides one of that ratchets that keeps rich people rich. They do not pay the costs of inflation (or pay them last). Every single time there is an inflationary event, be it a natural disaster caused by climate change, a war, a pandemic, etc, taxes should immediately rise on the wealthy to pay for it. If they do not, then, it is a tax on the poor and working class that will be hand waved away as “inflation”.

    • GraniteM@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 days ago

      I remember some self-congratulatory headline crowing about how happy we should all be that inflation had slowed and thinking…

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      In the mean time “the economy” is booming and companies make record profits. This should have been addressed but wasn’t, Biden never got the mandate to fix it, he did not have all 3 branches he needed.

      Now the republicans do have the mandate, to do anything they deem nessecary. Let’s see how it pans out, It’s either massive spending like last time and it will be okay ish for the economy. If it’s austerity, the whole world is fucked.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah, anytime there’s a split house / debate / presidency in the US, all the Republicans have to do is obstruct progress or anything from being done, and then workers end up paying the price.

        It’s why being centrist isn’t good enough, whenever the Democrats get full control they need to be trying to drastically shift things back, but they have always failed to do so.

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          That is because building institutions is A LOT harder than tearing them down. The dem variant would most likely be something like stopping all subsidies to corporations and giving the money to the poor, and working up. just cash in hand, you sort it out yourself… sort of like UBI.

          Edit: but the scarcity in things like the housing market would mean everything immediately jumps in price…