• AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I absolutely do not count that one, unless we assume that “turn the place into a civil war economy and enable the formation of ISIS” is a valid win condition. Which is a stretch when they went in there expecting to turn it into an obedient vassal state like postwar Germany or Japan, which is something that Dubya’s administration seems to have seriously believed.

    • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      DC’s architects made their money off of rebuilding, mercenaries, and corruption. I’m pretty sure they count it as a win regardless of what ever humble pie the media made them eat for that brief period America pretended to care, back in… 2015/2016, was it?

    • PKMKII [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      It only works under the very narrow criteria of “removing Saddam from power,” but yeah by any other metric it was a boondoggle of the highest order. A sort of, I got rid of the wasp’s nest in the attic, I just caused a five alarm fire in the process.

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely. What worries me about Iraq is that it may have tought the US that they do not need to be successful, but that it can already benefit them when they just fuck shit up for real in a strategically important corner of the globe.