• nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    So as he said: very precise

    When they crushed IS in Raqqa it was about 1,5 civilians for each IS bro

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I really don’t think you understand what “precise” means.

      It means only killing the people you intended to kill.

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re thinking about ‘100% precise’

        War is never 100% precise. Hezbollah themselves cause 0.7 civilian casualties for every IDF/Israeli police they manage to kill in this conflict

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            You don’t go inside Lebanon and assassinate thousands of militants, that’s just an impossible expectation

            Maybe in your magical fairy world you can, but in the real world 2 dead kids from 3.000 strikes would be considered very precise

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s quite dishonest to act like that it was only 2 dead kids and ignore the thousands of wounded and the other 10 dead people. Especially when a link you yourself showed people says so.

              Misinformation is not allowed in c/worldnews.

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m not acting like those were the only civilian casualties. It’s just what’s brought up all the time. ‘Thousands’ of civilians wounded seems very unlikely when there’s only <3.000 of these devices going off and the extent of the explosions visible from the leaked footage. Reeks of misinformation if you ask me

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  This is from the link you provided.

                  More than 3,500 people were injured.

                  So now you’re saying we can’t trust the link you gave us?

                  • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    But it’s you that’s suggesting those injured are all civilians

                    If not, how many of them are?