The new study, funded by the government and carried out by King’s College London (KCL) and the homelessness charity Greater Change, will recruit 360 people in England and Wales. Half will continue to get help from frontline charities. The other half will get additional help from Greater Change, whose support workers will discuss their financial problems then pay for items such as rent deposits, outstanding debts, work equipment, white goods, furniture or new clothes. They do not make direct transfers to avoid benefits being stopped due to a cash influx.

Professor Michael Sanders, who runs KCL’s experimental government unit, said: “What we’re trying to understand is the boundary conditions for cash transfers. When does it work? For whom does it work? What are the amounts you need to give people in order to make it work?”

One of the first cash transfer schemes was in Mexico in 1997 and since then they have been used around the world. But most evidence is from low and middle-income countries, and there has been opposition from politicians and the public, who often believe people will spend the money unwisely. Last year researchers in Canada found that giving CA$7,500 (£4,285) to 50 homeless people in Vancouver was more effective than spending money housing them in shelters, and saved around CA$777 (£443) per person.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This has been tried multiple times across numerous jurisdictions. Consistently it’s been found that giving poor people money makes them less poor in the long run. This seems to be an unsavory result, however, so politicians let the experiment retire never to actually learn from the results and draft policy.

    This experiment is going to work and then nothing will come of it only for another jurisdiction to try exactly the same thing again and find exactly the same results.

    The myth of meritocracy is still too prevalent a belief.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      George Carlin hit this on the head. If you don’t have the homeless there’s no one to scare the poor into working.

      • whithom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        For the wealthy, It’s important to keep people one paycheck away from the street. If you pay people too much, they have options. When people have options, they don’t blindly obey. If people know they can’t ever hit the street, they will demand more from the rich to wipe their asses.

        This is why slavery exists. As long as you put food in the trough, they are alive to serve.