“We are raising funds to support a critical legal defense in the fight against unchecked corporate power and a system that continues to favor the few over everyone else. This case isn’t just about one individual—it’s about challenging a status quo that protects the interest of the powerful at the expense of justice and fairness,” read one of the fundraising pages that was quickly removed by GoFundMe.

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, they didn’t. This is the part where you realize cheering on control of one side will come back to bite your side eventually. Now the only path he’ll have are those conservative-based fundraiser sites. Funny how that works out

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Eh? I never cheered anything on. If anything I would want all sides to be treated equally. Either you’re allowed to open a fund me for criminal defence or you’re not.

      I don’t choose what I support based on my political leaning and I think anybody that does is a dishonest person.

      Edit: I was merely asking a question as I recall funds being raised for Rittenhouse, I just didn’t recall which site.