I’m always amazed to see how some of my friends are just able to read any book recommended to them with no hesitation at all; whereas with me, I need to research what kind of book it is, what ideas the book will be wrestling with, the author and their writing style. Like currently, I am struggling to give “Being and Time” by Martin Heidegger a try as I am more of a fan of Bertrand Russel and analytical philosophy which seems to be scientific in nature – especially when compared to that of Heidegger, so I’ve heard. I feel that if I am spending my time reading something, that I should come away at the end of the book having learned something of value (to me, that’s a pretty subjective statement). I think this is a good thing, as just about every book I’ve chosen to read has been an enlightening and somewhat euphoric experience that cannot be replaced. I wonder though, does anyone else relate?
If it’s a recommendation to “just get through it, it’s worth it” then yeah I can force a book. Generally I read fiction, but this rule is kind of universal for me:
I will give you 1 to 3 chapters. If I’m not seeing potential or really enjoying myself, I’m out.
I like to read about 2 books a month, and if I don’t like it I read much more slowly.