Hello everyone,

Thinking about this as the on-boarding experience on Lemmy can be subpar, especially because new joiners have to

In order to avoid this, what would you think of having a “new joiners” instance, where

  • hexbear, lemmygrad and ml would be defederated
  • politics and news communities would be blocked at the instance level

That could help to onboard people, so that the first time they look around, they see more gardening, cute comics and casual conversation rather than another set of depressing memes.

Disclaimer: politics and societal issues are important and should be discussed extensively (they are quite popular on Lemmy, let’s be honest). I’m not advocating to hide them all, just to not show them as the first content people potentially interested in Lemmy would see.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would argue something like starter packs would be a better fit for this particular feature.

      • OpenStars
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Except instance blocklists don’t really work much, and are too controversial, and some kind of community sourced user blocklist also is far too controversial. Libs blocking tankies, tankies blocking neolibs, so many in the middle blocking neither, or perhaps both I dunno:-P.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s kinda what Bluesky has with their “moderation lists” or whatever it’s called. They have an entire dedicated MAGA one that blocks all MAGA accounts that join Bluesky automatically for whoever is subscribed to it

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      The issue is that starter packs would require development. This proposal can be implemented using the existing tools.

      • Kaja@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not really, you would just need a community that’s focused on posting starter packs, and for people advertising Lemmy to others to direct people to that starter pack community when checking out Lemmy. There are things that could be developed to help make starter packs more useful, but it could start off as simply as just people making posts with lists of communities that people interested in crocheting or whatever should go check out.

        • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          We already have !newcommunities@lemmy.world that is supposed to fill another issue (discoverability of communities), and every week someone asks “how can I discover communities” on !asklemmy, someone points !newcommunities to them, and they say they weren’t aware of it.

          It’s even in the rotating instances messages of Lemmy.world, but still.

          • OpenStars
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Some interesting facts:

            • the release date of 0.19.3 was 2024-01-24
            • also one year ago, when Lemmy.World defederated from Lemmygrad.ml, they said “Due to the severity of the posts and comments, we are not waiting for the next Lemmy update that will allow users to block instances.”
            • two years ago this post also mentions “Unlike Mastodon, Lemmy does not provide a feature for individual users to block an instance (yet). This creates a dilemma where we must either defederate [or]…”

            Fast-forward to today, and Lemmy still does not offer the ability to block users from an instance. Or for reports to federate to moderators on remote instances. The pace of development is quite slow, and shows little signs of speeding up. Furthermore, why would those same admins of lemmy.ml be in favor of sharing the same power that they wield on that instance with everyone using this software?

            Rust is not a language conducive to making many changes to the codebase. I predict that one year from now there will be little change in the Lemmy software, with people still begging for features that they hoped for two years ago already. To be clear it’s not the fault of the developers, but of people having too high expectations and hopes.

            So yeah, the OP idea is a good one, but I’ll cover that separately and here just wanted to say that the slow pace of new features is by design of the language used, and people must simply get used to that.

            • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Furthermore, why would those same admins of lemmy.ml be in favor of sharing the same power that they wield on that instance with everyone using this software?

              I’m not too sure. If tomorrow someone came up with a pull request to add that feature, the devs would have to accept it, or publicly admit they actively reject that feature, which would probably create a platform wide drama