• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    No Y = 0

    Presence of Y = 1

    Looks like you can express it with binary if you want, though you would need an interpreter

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 minutes ago

      You can have a partial Y chromosome or transfer of Y genes to the X chromosome during meiosis which can result in a person with both sets of sex organs, or more rarely, no sex organs at all. Even genetic sex cannot be accurately represented as one bit (let alone gender identity).

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      That’s a chromosome you encoded there which is one of a few markers that define sex, not gender.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Same thing

        It’s meaningless to who the individual is, unless you’re a conservative that believes playing with dolls or wearing makeup makes you a girl but then I don’t care for your opinion

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yes, chromosomes are meaningless to who someone is (except edge-cases).

          No, sex and gender aren’t the same.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      except that genetics isn’t that simple, there’s many many things that go into structuring your body. Even biological sex isn’t binary, there’s plenty of overlap. People can literally be born with both sets of genitals afaik.