• Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Why are you complaining about the FDA doing their job, rather than the large corps that likely lobbied to avoid this and make it much harder for them?

    They banned it in cosmetics in 1990, it seems pretty obvious that if it’s unsafe for the outside of our body it shouldn’t be inside either.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If they were doing their job, they would remove dangerous “herbal” remedies people are giving to their kids and hurting or even killing them, not something that has a small chance of causing cancer if you feed a shit ton of it to a rat.

      As I showed to someone else, it took ten years for the FDA to get a company to voluntarily recall a product that was causing seizures in hundreds of babies. https://www.statnews.com/2017/04/13/homeopathy-tablets-recall/

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          In the sense that they are both so poorly regulated that they both have contained all kinds of substances which are actively harmful to people? No, they really aren’t.

          In fact, some claim to be both.

          • finley@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            In the context of this article, they are. Your argument about something else is a straw man and a whataboutism.

            If you think the FDA should regulate something else that it currently does not, take it to Congress. They’re the ones who decide what the FDA does and does not regulate.