Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1723arrow-down112cross-posted to: chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
arrow-up1711arrow-down1imageSorry for the inconveniencesh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square66fedilinkcross-posted to: chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
minus-squareHeyMrDeadMan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoThat’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·1 year agoPretty much this size
minus-squareurinnerchild87@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoI think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year ago2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
minus-squareJohandea@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoCan you please start using real units. Seriously.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoIt’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoNo. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
minus-squarenonailsleft@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 year agoThey should just refer to the caliber
minus-squarehydrospanner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoRelevant username. That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoI googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
minus-squareSnipingNinja@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThat doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
minus-squareFilthyShrooms@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoI am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
minus-squarePickTheStick@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoLol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?
That’s funny… until I actually think about a 2.5in diameter turd… then I’m horrified.
Pretty much this size
I think 2.5 inches would be closer to a soda can if we’re using references.
2.5" in diameter is just under a baseball (2.8").
Can you please start using real units. Seriously.
It’s the same size as a cricket ball, 2.8".
No. 2.5" is in real units already. What’s your problem with size comparisons?
They should just refer to the caliber
I fire 120 mm high-explosive rounds
Relevant username.
That thing is nowhere near 2.5" dia.
I googled for 50 mm. That should be close enough.
Relevant username
2.5 inches is 635 mm. Thats much closer to 50 cm
That doesn’t sound right to me. An inch has ~2.54 cm, so 2.5" should be 6.35 cm and a cm has 10mm, so that becomes 63.5mm
1 inch is 25,4 mm, not 254 mm.
I am often incorrect. Today is one of those days
Lol, 2.5 inches is over 2 feet?