The tech exists, and vehicles on the road already have it, yet a consortium of carmakers doesn’t want to make this lifesaving equipment standard. The reason is as old as the hills—money.
The tech exists, and vehicles on the road already have it, yet a consortium of carmakers doesn’t want to make this lifesaving equipment standard. The reason is as old as the hills—money.
My car gives a warning when it detects a potential collision.
Usually, it’s right before I start turning into a turn.
I get it, it’s 2-bit brain doesn’t realize that the car will not, in fact, drive straight into the wall.
It doesn’t realize that I have had my foot off the gas in anticipation.
I would really hate if the car would brake under those circumstances.
Treated myself to a used Q8 eTron, first nice car I’ve ever had. I must say, all the bells and whistles, adaptive cruise control that eases off the go pedal when a town comes up, night vision that warns if an animal has a vector crossing mine, hands off stop and go and all that works neatly.
Emergency braking together with night vision was hard on the brakes once before I even knew that a deer was even there. It crossed into the high beams fractions of a second later and every screen in the car and the HUD had a red triangle in it with a deer symbol while I was already hanging in the seat belt. Yeah, no shit, thanks engineers.
What I’m saying is: Apparently all that stuff can be made properly, manufacturers just choose not to.
Fair enough. I have an 8 year old Mercedes.
Perhaps I should get a newer car.