• keegomatic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    That may be true, but at actual companies the term DEI is almost always used, not DEIA, for internal initiatives.

      • keegomatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The people who run these initiatives tend to be people who care, actually, in my experience. It’s DEI because DEI is the standard industry-wide term. Have you worked at a company that uses the DEIA initialism instead?

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I am not questioning the motives of any one particular person, I am asking why the system is the way it is.

          Where did the A go?

          • keegomatic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            The motives matter because I am telling you that they would call it DEIA if it were considered better practice to do so, because the people in the company who take on these initiatives are the people who care enough to do it, and they try to get it right. Do you know people involved in such initiatives? Because I do. And they called it DEI when we used to talk about it. And they changed quite a bit about the initiative based on feedback from members of marginalized groups in the company, so they would have changed the way they referred to it (DEI => DEIA) as well. This is a common experience. The fact that it is called DEI by politicians is simply not a purposeful slight in this instance.