• hakase@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Damn, Poe’s Law hittin this comment hard, and I can’t tell from the instance either.

    Edit: oh Jesus, they were serious. Parody truly is dead. At least we get to publicly shame the stupid misandrist.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Non exaggerated non explicit comments without enough context deserve to be taken seriously. Sadly.

      • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        1 day ago

        sadly I have to take a comment about how males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          O shit you were serious?? Thabks for misinterpreting my comment btw. Let me correct that for you.

          sadly I have to take a comment justifying sexist generalizations on men because males have more privileges compared to most other groups seriously.

          It’s not the part about men having more priviledges that people are having issues with, it’s the part that THAT somehow excuses being sexist against men.

          • Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            23 hours ago

            if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality

            • tjsauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              21 hours ago

              By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.

              The words you use are good, but the context is bad.