The comments on the Scripta blog — written under the username “riikka” — include multiple uses of the Finnish equivalent of the n-word as well as other racial slurs, anti-immigrant rhetoric and apparent threats of violence. The texts use racist expressions such as “mocha dicks” and “Turkish monkeys”.
On 25 August 2008, “riikka” wrote: “Greetings from Barcelona. There is no “alarming immigration problem” to be seen here. N-word sell pirated Vuittons on Las Ramblas, scarves are hidden and each stays with their own.”
On 25 September 2008, “riikka” wrote about a confrontation on a train with young people from an immigrant background, saying “If they gave me a gun, there’d be bodies on a commuter train, you see.”
I was simply quoting the Wikipedia page.
The one where only Russia designates them a terrorist organization?
No, the one I already linked.
Hard to tell when in literally that part you link to a different site. But that still leaves you spreading Russia’s talking points. And FWIW I have edited the page in question after having translated all 3 sources and finding no mention of Azov being proscribed or designated terrorist in any of them.
Fair enough, I see that it wasn’t mentioned in those 3 sources. Either way, they’re still Neo-Nazi. And in my personal opinion, that makes them terrorists, but I can understand if you don’t want to use the word terrorist. So just call them: Neo-Nazis. That doesn’t make them any less deserving of derision.
They are neo-nazi (though apparently more nationalist than neo-nazi, or they’d care more about their President being Jewish), but they are also one of the bigger groups fighting against an attack by a fascist state who calls them a terrorist group. So the least one can do is not aligning with that state.
edit: Even better, they only called them terrorists after they attacked Ukraine.