• tromars@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s how umlauts historically evolved, but nowadays I wouldn‘t say ü short for ue, but its own letter (even though you still can write it as ue if you don’t have it available on your keyboard or whatever)

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, my point is that it’s not considered a u, and Austrian and Swiss don’t use it.

      Also, fun fact, some romance languages like French and Brazilian Portuguese have an identical diacritic to umlaut but it’s different. It’s meant to mean the vowel is separate (like in the word naïve)

      • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        in Brazillian portuguese it had a completely different meaning, and it was used for disambiguation of the pronounciation of some words, in short “gue” in portuguese can make a ghe (gh as in ghost) or a gue (gu as in guatemala), a similiar thing happens with “que”, this umlaug looklike was meant to make clear that the “u” was to be pronounced, so we had spellings like “freqüencia”

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s exactly the other meaning I described. In Portuguese it was/is used to separate the vowels so they are not pronounced together.

      • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        We call it tréma. Aka diaeresis. It explicitly tells you to pronounce two vowels near each other separately.
        A typical use is to indicate a normally silent vowel must be read out. For example “maïs” (MA-EE-S’) is completely different from “mais” (MAY).