PugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down135
arrow-up11.3Karrow-down1imageThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-squareSergio@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 days ago probably not going to save 95% of the trees I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
minus-squareLibertyLizard@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·2 days agoI’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
minus-squarePugJesus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·2 days agoI supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”
I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
I’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
I supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”