• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Don’t shit on journalists. If the media is your enemy then you’re no better than MAGA.

    • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have no issue with journalists, but you’re not going to find them on an entertainment channel. The Washington Post was rubber stamping war profiteering before Bozos bought them.

      The majority of outlets are owned by an ever concentrating number of billionaires. Blind trust is the last thing you want to give them.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Random counterexample, John Oliver probably agrees more with you than me and he runs a comedy news show on HBO. There are tons of people just like him.

        The fact that Washington Posts’ Harris endorsement which Bezos prevented from printing was immediately leaked means the editors and owners do not have complete control of the narrative.

        • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Bro… John Oliver is a comedian and doesn’t consider himself a journalist: https://www.npr.org/2016/02/12/466569047/is-john-olivers-show-journalism-he-says-the-answer-is-simple-no

          He’s also not a billionaire nor own the show or the network it’s on.

          Like you’re agreeing that the media outlet is under orders to shape the narrative… But then somehow take the individual journalists leaking things they were ordered not to as some perverse reason to still trust the outlet?

          I’m not even sure what you’re trying to say as your defense of the American press is a British comedian and an admission a billionaire shapes WaPo’s narratives.

          You are all over the map.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The actual Journalists have mostly been fired from most mainstream media in the US.

      It’s now mostly Propagandists and Click-bait Enhancing Specialists.

      You can blame Liberals as much as the MAGA crowd for moving newspapers away from Journalism and into Propaganda.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        We still hear about Trump dismantling government offices with interviews from employees, we still hear about hospitals shutting down, we still hear about environmental disasters, we still hear about the ICE in military gear going door to door.

        You might not like whats in the news, but Journalists are working for your benefit.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The shocking obvious superficial shit that brings in lots of clicks will always be published.

          That’s what gave Trump lots of proeminence from the very start - say something outrageous -> have the Click Enhancers put your face and your words in front of everybody.

          The actual real Journalism (especially Investigative Journalism that dig down into the details and dug out things like closed-door agreements to tilt things just so in favour of a few) has long moved out of the big news media, as has actual Journalistic Ethics ever since newspapers started to be expected to do things like side with a candidate in Presidential elections.

          You’re confusing companies owned by billionaires which historically, decades ago, did have actual Journalists on the payroll, with present day makers of Journalism.

          Just note how little Corruption or at the very least Conflicts of Interest of people in positions of power is mentioned in the big newsmedia publications.

    • tree_frog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      When corporate media is primarily concerned with profit. That’s not free press.

      Which isn’t to say journalists don’t have a right to earn a living. But rather that shareholder profits have way more influence in what gets published then they should.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        What you fail to realize is accruement of capital of many opposing businesses isn’t the enemy at this juncture.

        The unchecked power of an elected fascist dismantling democracy is.

        There is no all consuming hivemind that connects to people more as their wealth increases, they’re all competing against one another.

        • tree_frog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Elon Musk’s media machine and unchecked wealth is a large part of why we are even having this conversation.

          And in 2016 it was Fox News.

          And while you are correct, that businesses are competing against each other and there is no overarching hive mind. They also have an incentive to compete against the working class. And in that regard, many corporations are aligned.

          Folks can compete with each other and still have common interest. And in a capitalist society, the common interest of capitalists is to suppress and oppress the working class.

          Edit: also, I didn’t down vote you for your opinion. I down voted you for presuming to know what I realize and what I don’t. Because frankly, it felt rude.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            The way I see it is they’ve got more incentive as rational actors to promote security and equality. What is interfering with that is irrational primal instincts that make some of them want to hoard wealth and attack those who are physically or culturally different from them.

            More billionaires supported a candidate who promised to tax their unrealized gains than they sided with Trump. Trumps billionaires just happened to capture enough social media to tilt things his way.

            • tree_frog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Oh yeah I agree there.

              And I admit the original comment that started mine in your conversation was too broad. There are enlightened business interests who understand that security and equity is good for business in the long term. I did undergraduate business administration studies, and they teach DEI. Not because it’s the ethical thing to do, but because it is good for the bottom line in the long run. Especially in a diverse globalized economy.

              But I also get their knee jerk reaction about the media. Billionaires operating on those primal instincts have captured a lot of it, and it is frustrating.