Blaze@lemmy.zip to Privacy@programming.dev · 13 days ago[Meta] Should we consolidate this community with !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ?message-squaremessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up117arrow-down1message-square[Meta] Should we consolidate this community with !privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ?Blaze@lemmy.zip to Privacy@programming.dev · 13 days agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
!privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com has 900 users / day 1.58K users / week 2.86K users / month This community has 61 users / day 220 users / week 483 users / month
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 days agoI would say they are endorsing it by using it, but lets not split hairs. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools is too restrictive for a privacy community.
minus-squarePhilipTheBucket@ponder.catlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·12 days ago I would say they are endorsing it by using it I feel like I just raised a counterexample to this. Like, literally just, in the very short message you’re responding to. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools Again: Misleading. If you want to talk about crypto, fine. Be honest about what you want to do and why you think it’s important.
I would say they are endorsing it by using it, but lets not split hairs. Not being about to talk about a funding part of many privacy tools is too restrictive for a privacy community.
I feel like I just raised a counterexample to this. Like, literally just, in the very short message you’re responding to.
Again: Misleading. If you want to talk about crypto, fine. Be honest about what you want to do and why you think it’s important.