• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    They intentionally killed it, when it wasn’t theirs, it was a nuisance, when it was theirs, it wasn’t a nuisance, but also not too useful.

    It’s about control, I think.

    I mean, without Skype going bad would all these <censored> IMs, especially Telegram, become so popular?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, which makes me wonder on the old question if it’s possible to create a distributed IM as prolific as bittorrent protocol.

        In that last example they did something right. At some point I liked ed2k+kad and would swear at bittorrent for not incorporating search, reputation and such as basic components, but maybe that’s what made torrents survive when other filesharing tools went out of common knowledge.

        I’m going to think on this.