• Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I never said weapons don’t matter, I said people do matter, and if the war goes on long enough then ukraine won’t have any to fight the war.

    The weapon difference between colonial India and Britain is nowhere near that between Russia and Ukraine. This has become a war of artillery and drones, both sides have them and can produce them at scale. This isn’t some colonial era imperial war where one side has machine guns and the other has a couple muskets and swords.

    Why don’t you look to more modern examples where overwhelming firepower and technological superiority was supposed to win a war, like Vietnam or Afghanistan. Hell look at Korea, China was able to force the Americans to a draw after it’s economy was in ruins after a decade of Japanese occupation and civil war while the u.s. had half the worlds production capacity. The Russian economy is leagues better then China was in the early 50s, and the u.s. isnt nearly as dominant.

    • caboose2006@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Modern example. Sure. Desert storm 1991. The Kuwaitis sure didn’t have to deal with an insurance after the Iraqis were kicked out.

      And that’s one thing all your examples have in common. A guerrilla insurgency fighting an invading or occupying force. That’s not what will happen in Ukraine.

      Give them what they need to win