California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a law requiring K-12 schools to provide gender-neutral bathrooms by July 2026.

The new law, Senate Bill 760, was among a series of laws signed by Newsom Saturday to expand protections for the state’s LGBTQ community.

“California is proud to have some of the most robust laws in the nation when it comes to protecting and supporting our LGBTQ+ community,” Newsom said in a statement.

Under the law, “each school district, county office of education, and charter school” would be required to have at least one gender-neutral bathroom on campus on or before July 1, 2026. The bathroom must be available for use during school hours and during school functions when students are present, the law states.

  • Rayspekt@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So there will stil be regular male/female toilets? In the end I’m kinda whatever about this as long as it’s not used as an excuse to remove urinals.

    • Old_Dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, every gender neutral bathroom I’ve seen here at elementary schools and college campuses have single occupancy gender neutral bathroom/s next to the men’s and women’s bathrooms.

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t read the text of the law, but unless it explicitly says otherwise, I suspect it will be up to the schools/districts. If they have the money and room to build separate non-gendered bathrooms, then some of them will do so. But I suspect that most will simply convert existing bathrooms and not have gender specific bathrooms at all.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every gender neutral bathroom I’ve been in has removed the urinals. It’s fucking annoying.

      • Rayspekt@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s what my comment is about. Just removing stuff until you end up at the common (worst) denominator is the worst kind of equality.

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      stares in confusion But urinals are the absolute worst. Benefits: cost less money and less space. Drawbacks: lack of privacy and inevitable splashback. Why would you want them?

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        So I don’t have to sit on a public toilet of questionable cleanliness. A small bit of splashback from my own piss is preferable.

        The privacy just has never been a concern bc no one is trying to look at other people’s dicks while pissing.

        • quindraco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you can use a urinal, you can piss in a toilet without sitting down.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            …which has all the same splashback issues except youre much more likely to have some piss spray in sone random spot outside the bowl

      • Rayspekt@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Urinals are more convenient when you just need to take a quick piss. I don’t get why another person next to you is a problem. Also just don’t piss dead center into the thing considering splashback. Do I really have to explain pissing now?