iPhone 15 overheating reports, with temperatures as high as 116F::Widespread reports are circulating about the iPhone 15 overheating, seemingly across all models. Measurements taken with an infrared camera show…

    • locuester@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      75
      ·
      1 year ago

      F makes more sense for this. It’s 0-100 on a scale of a human feeling too cold to too hot.

      In situations where what’s being discussed is touching human skin: weather, a hot phone, water temp, etc… F does give you a quicker idea of things.

      That said, downvote me away!

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t deny that. But it’s also a well suited 0-100 scale for weather. It’s rare for a native C person to agree. I accept and expect the downvotes because hurr durr usa is dumb. To be clear, C is way better for anything other than things that touch my skin.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            What's this 0-100 scale you're using? Just a personal comfort gauge that you're assuming everyone uses? I'm American and it doesn't even make sense to me. 70ish is room temperature, 98 is body temperature, 32 is freezing. That's a really weird scale which doesn't have any nuance to it especially since temperatures reach above 100 or below 0 in a lot of places. Add on that people like different temps and it's really confusing.

            For anyone willing to learn, a lot of devices have conversions from F to C. I have about half of my temp reporting equipment split so I can better understand C since all I personally knew was F. It also helps to have the formula in your head and convert it anytime you see F so you'll slowly be comfortable knowing both of them. (Fahrenheit - 32) / 1.8 = Celsius, usually just do / 2 for a simpler time: i.e. 72F - 32 = 40 / 2 = 20C (really 22.222C but it gets you in the ballpark at least). It's even easier to use the formula since 32 is Fahrenheit's freezing temp so just always minus that away and divide by 2.

            Like others have said, Fahrenheit is just easier for us because it's what we grew up with and learned. It has nothing to do with the actual system besides personal experience. Thinking the "0-100" is a scale that makes sense when the bottom 3/4 is colder than comfortable room temperature is just being irrational.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The average temperature in the continental United States is just over 50 degrees while the extreme highs and lows are 100 and 0. Could make an argument that 0 is a bit too low.

              Coincidentally, perhaps, but nonetheless you can’t deny it’s pretty good range for temperature of air in the US.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        No need to downvote, I can handle someone having a different opinion.

        Fahrenheit doesn't give a shit about human temperature, he based it on some obscure things (which I can't remember right now). It doesn't even fit with human temperature, I think human temperature is like 97 or 98 °F or something like that. The argument was made only to have some argument, it's not a property of Fahrenheit.

        It does make exactly as much sense as Celsius with one important distinction - Celsius plays nicely with other SI units.

        Seriously, the only correct answer to how many foot-pounds does it take to heat 1 fl oz of water by 1° F is fuck you.

        • locuester@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t mean it’s body temperature. I mean it’s good for describing temperature felt by a human. The weather is a scale of 0 being too cold to 100 being too hot. The typical person never sees temperature outside this range in their weather, but a good bit of the full range.

          When describing weather, you don’t care about 213 being boiling temp and converting to SI. In all Other uses, yes, C is better.

          • Sinnz@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s just you being used to the imperial system. I have no problem describing the difference between 0°C, 20°C and 40°C.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not saying it’s impossible to describe the difference in Celsius. What I’m saying is that the resolution is finer, and with the scale of 0 to 100 is quick to understand.

              The fact is we like to have a scale between zero and 100 for things. That’s what Fahrenheit is for weather. I understand you don’t agree, but that doesn’t change the fact that it is. I use both C and F. I prefer F for weather.

          • Jaccident@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly, I get your point, but I don’t think it’s necessarily a property of the scale, rather your increased familiarity with it. When someone says 68F I don’t have a mechanism to understand that, it’s not part of my experience. Saying 68% of too hot doesn’t help much at all. Whereas I can tell you exactly what I 40C feels like; and how that compares to anything from -15C to 45C, because of my familiarity with the scale.

            • locuester@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, familiarity with the scale definitely helps. But 50 degrees is halfway between burning up and freezing your ass off. Aka, light jacket weather.

    • qooqie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      119
      arrow-down
      211
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And if anyone’s wondering that’s 116°F in more normaler units

      Edit: it’s a multi layered joke guys chill. Joke is Americans can’t read, the °F is in the title. The other joke is that American grammar is shit

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        65
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy can be pretty hostile to non-European standards. It’s weird… I wonder if Europeans are just using more accounts than Americans, and stacking votes.

        If not… Then yikes, if Lemmy is losing the American audience, that’s bad news, friends.

        • coin@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Celsius and Fahrenheit are both European units. It’s just that Fahrenheit is used by less than 5% of the world’s population, so it’s completely reasonable to expect a post title on an international website like this to use Celsius.

          • ledtasso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            To be fair, the Fahrenheit measurement should be pretty intuitive here. Fahrenheit is easy because 0 degrees is “really fucking cold” and 100 degrees is “really fucking hot.” So anything triple-digits should be easily recognizable as “yeah that’s way too fucking hot for a phone.”

            This is also why I prefer Fahrenheit to Celsius in general (even though I am an engineer and am not a die-hard patriot or anything like that). It is a more practical scale for everyday usage.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why are Americans so bad at geography 🤦

          You do know there’s a world outside of the US and Europe, yeah? Like other places are a thing that exist? And guess what - they all use Celsius!

          This isn’t a Europe Vs US thing. This is a US Vs the world thing, with Americans expecting their way to be taken seriously by everyone.

          Don’t be surprised when people want to use the actual standard.

          • paultimate14@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s an incredibly euro-centric view to think that the rest of the world uses the metric system. Heck, even the UK mixes and matches units contextually. Plenty of global industries apply their own standards.

            I’ve never seen an American on the Internet suggest China move from Chi to Feet, for example. Europeans just assume that they use Meters because they’re polite enough to just do the conversion on their end for international trade.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You do realise we’re talking about Celsius here, don’t you?

              The UK absolutely uses Celsius, as does the vast majority of the world. To my knowledge it’s just the US and Liberia.

              There is nothing Eurocentric about saying Celsius is the standard. There is, however, extreme US-centricity in thinking Fahrenheit is the normal one.

                • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, the UK mainly uses metric but for a few things they use imperial or both. For road signs they’re mostly imperial - what does that have to do with Celsius?

                  You’re not making yourself look good here by deliberately going off-topic.

        • Johanno@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you stupid? Lemmy isn’t hostile to the US. We are hostile to idiots who do not recognize standards. That this includes most of the US is just a coincidence.

        • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, every European has at least 3 lemmy accounts, as required by the European constitution.

        • DarienGS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are a lot more Europeans online than Americans (not to mention a few billion internet users on other continents), so when Americans post temperatures exclusively in Fahrenheit it comes across as kinda thoughtlessly parochial.

          • paultimate14@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are a lot more Europeans online than Americans

            1. I don’t believe this at all lol

            2. The audience for this is English speakers. While much of the world reads English non-natively, those people often turn to news source in their native languages. If this article were in French, using Fahrenheit would be silly.

            3. Most iPhone users are American. This data shows that just a few years ago 43% of iPhones were sold in the US, with Japan in 2nd at 14% and China at 13%. Even adding up the UK, France, Germany, and Australia they combine for 20%, though once again I’d expect French and German articles fod those audiences.

            Europeans just can’t handle the fact that colonization is over lol.

        • Weslee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol, second comment this morning I’ve seen someone complaining about their fundamentally incorrect statement is recieving “unfair” hostility…

          No, you’re just wrong and people downvoted you because of it

  • Kumabear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    46c… lmfao what a stupid headline.

    That is absolutely NOT “hot”or “overheating” for a piece of tech under stress.

    The phone housing is the heat sync, and the phone is more powerful than many people’s few year old laptops.

    Not to defend apple but this is just trying to sensationalise and farm clicks, my pixel 7 used to get way hotter doing just normal tasks to the point I was getting overheat warnings and the screen would shut off.

    Now if it was more like 55c I could see that being an issue at least from a comfort standpoint.

    On top of this, pointing a thermal camera as an emissive surface like glass… not the most accurate way to actually get a temperature reading, they should have used a thermal couple… but I’m guessing that would have showed an even less exciting click bait number.

      • Patius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends on how you’re holding it and how spread that heat is. 46° isn’t something great to be grasping for extended periods of time, but if you’re physically touching 30°C parts of the phone and a part with no physical contact with your skin is 46°C, it’s probably not that bad.

        My s7 edge used to hit these temps. The annoying part was the throttling and shutdowns. I never really felt like I was burning my hands using the thing.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Excuse me, but this has “you’re holding it wrong” energy. And according to this page, 44°C is starting to feel painful to touch, and 47° is enough to cause 1st degree burn.

          • sverit@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Proteins and enzymes begin to denaturate at temps >40°C, that's why a feaver exceeding this temperature is dangerous and why we feel a warning pain at 44°C.

      • Kumabear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        43
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not “overheating” either though is it?

        46c is not that hot at all, that’s like half as hot as a cup of coffee.

        It’s probably not ideal… but also not at all new and about the same as my S22 ultra hits under load or when charging which runs far cooler than my previous pixel 7 which would actively overheat if you tried to run maps while charging it on a warm day, to the point it would force the screen to min brightness after about 30min.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I’ve had overheating issues while running maps and charging on older iPhones too. Not with Apple Maps but with third party mapping software that pushed the CPU/GPU a little too hard. Doesn’t tend to happen on modern hardware with mature mapping software.

          Also, iPhones do a lot of computation on your photo library while charging. They do things locally on device that Google would do in the cloud. Combine that (for years of photos and not just the ones you took in the last day or so) with normal heat from charging the battery and 46°C seems pretty reasonable to me.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually it can pose quite a big problem. There’s no ventilation on phone anywhere and lithium batteries really don’t like heat, at all. In fact that’s just at the top maximum battery can take, so there’s a big chance of thermal runaway at which point whole thing might combust.

      • time_lord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lithium batteries aren’t going to thermal runaway at 46ºc.

        Edit: I looked it up. it’s ~66º, so maybe closer for comfort that one would like.

        • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup. Not that far from recorded temps. Combine that with leaving phone in car or in direct sunlight and you enter dangerous zone.

          • ave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            iirc iphones at least turn off if overheating so they might just be fine in that regard. sucks to get to your phone in the other room and find it turned off tho ig.

            • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Those situations are best avoided. Fail safes are there to prevent catastrophic failure, but heat does affect things permanently. Your battery life will take a big hit. CPU might not like it, etc.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get where you’re coming from, but just because it isn’t hot when compared to a full throttle desktop CPU doesn’t mean it’s good for a device you hold with your bare hands.

      Can you name one other thing in everyday life that you hold for hours on end, that gets 45+°C?

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look here, apple fan boy. You can try to piss and moan whatever way you want, but if you read the article you'd see this was happening while charging or just watching videos and doing "light duty use". A 116f case is absolutely not normal for that. My three+ year old phone doesn't even get a bit warm doing any of that. If my phone went over 90f from watching videos I'd be pissed. Apple likely screwed something up on their software side and the processor is spinning its gears hard for little to no reason.

      • Kumabear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has also come out that there is a bug in the instagram app from what I’ve been reading.

        This is causing a drastic increase in temperature and battery use on all iOS devices running ios17.

        This could very well just be some app code bug that is caught in a processing loop.

        It also explains why some people are seeing this and others are not, as not everyone is sitting on instagram while their phone is on charge.

    • Ankkuli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please take that common sense elsewhere. Here we don’t defend Apple since this is a general technology community. You are supposed to hate them no matter what. Only if this happens to an Android device, we try our best to understand.

    • Gamey@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It has a battery directly next to the CPU, you can’t compare that to a desktop or Laptop and will take damage FAR sooner, especially conaidering what a pain “modern” smartphones are to repair, even something trivial like the battery almost requires a specialist!

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So one semi long YouTube video is all it would take to get a burn? And you’d not even need a full length movie to need a trip to the hospital?

      I get that these aren’t “instant” burns, but this is still a device people regularly hold for hours a day. And if you don’t realize it’s heating up, you’re likely to notice only when you’re in pain.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea I think that when something is hot enough to cause burns, even when it takes minutes, I think it’s uncomfortable enough for people to let go way WAY before anything bad happens. If you don’t then you probably need medication for whatever condition ails you

      • AdamantRatPuncher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or a game with some relatively large 3d model and textures. I guess that, if the average play time is about 45 minutes, then…not good at all. But who’d hold a triple digit temperature thing in his hands?

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If the temp increase is slow, people don’t realize it’s hot unless they happen to put it down or reposition it.

          When my son was younger, he burnt his legs by using a laptop on his lap. It got hot, he didn’t realize.

          Same concept as being in the shower and very slowly changing the temp until you’re showering in fully hot/cold water.

      • ram@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Realistically speaking, since this is in fast charging only, and most people don’t let their phone battery drain to 0, I think it’s unlikely that 3rd degree burns will be an issue within reason. The iPhone 15’s reported to take about 30 minutes to charge from 0 to 50%, so if I assume the other 50% also takes 30 minutes, then really, someone won’t be hitting 45 minutes unless they’re charging from below 25% to full.[1]

        That said, 3rd degree burns may be an issue once you slip a case on it that insulates the phone, making it yet hotter, and 2nd degree burns will be more of an issue too. I’d be interested in seeing what the peak temp is during fast charging with a case on, especially one of the thicker cases. If it internally gets to more than 140 degrees Fahrenheit, there’s absolutely risk that it could explode, and even if it’s not doing it externally, internally it may be nearing those temps.


        1. I know charging isn’t actually linear progression, but I don’t really wanna do the math. ↩︎

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or maybe let’s not trivialize a defect that can cause 2nd degree burns making them look like nothing?

          • ram@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Chill Maalus, I’m pretty clearly addressing 3rd degree burns, and only even mentioning 2nd degree burns in circumstances that are likely to increase their risk.

            What part of this set you off, genuinely? Was it the reference of it as a risk? Was it that I actually looked at the facts? No part of me thinks this is good. This is very obviously and inarguably unacceptable, and no part of my post states otherwise.

            Funny too that you ignore the post right next to mine that legitimately is minimizing it.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              “chill dude it’s clearly addressing the meat being charred and falling off the bone, and only mentioning potentially life threatening blisters in passing”.

              • ram@bookwormstory.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I mean, I didn’t have anything to say with regards to the 2nd degree burns, really, so I didn’t feel the need to comment on them. Didn’t know any reply I made had to both acknowledge everything I agree with as well as make comment on what I feel was comment-worthy.

                So I’ll start now. I disagree with your lackadaisical portrayal of me. Neither is it accurate nor does it form a coherent argument against me. It simply acts as an ad hominem used in the place of a substantiated or communicated argument.

                I agree with nothing in your non-statement.

                Also characterizing 2nd degree burns on the hands as potentially life-threatening was irresponsible of pseudo-me. Pseudo-I shouldn’t have done that, as it’s untrue. Pseudo-me should know they’re severe and serious, but something doesn’t need to be described as “potentially life-threatening” to be severe and serious, and in fact, pseudo-me should be aware that this is a minimization of things that don’t kill you but severely impact one’s quality-of-life, as 2nd degree hand burns would.

          • ram@bookwormstory.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Apparently. I’d drop dead before I buy one myself but a friend told me today that with fast charging the 15 charges to 100% in 55 minutes.

            • DNU@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sooo… still fast charging speeds from over 5 years ago. What have they messed up for it to heat up like that? Lmao

              • ram@bookwormstory.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well naturally this is a brand new technology that Tim Apple invented last week. It's the best in the industry and really, $1000 for a phone this cutting edge is a bargain, even if it can literally burn your hands. /s

        • LUHG@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Complete opposite. I've never seen any other group of people let their phone drop so low. It's like they do it on purpose. I blame the lack of battery % so they don't get the anxiety effects.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How long do you figure it'll take them to make a phone that triggers nuclear fusion? Asking for a friend.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a massive problem. It's not ok for a device which millions of people use to get so hot. This could cause a fire given the right conditions.

    I hope this gets reported on the mainstream news so people realise Apple isn't so great after all.

    This is by far not the first time they've had hardware issues with their products. I think hardware is their Achilles heel.

    Not that I feel sorry for them considering how much they fleece customers on the prices for the devices, repairs, accessories, the amount of times they tell you to get a whole new Mac when all it needs is 1 part etc.

    • quaddo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This could cause a fire given the right conditions.

      Something tells me it could also cause a fire given the wrong conditions.

      (sorry yeah I'll see myself out)

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apples hardware is one of their strengths. By far the best in class in mosts categories they compete in.

      • danielfgom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You might want to ask Lou Rossman about that, he would beg to differ.

        I remember well when I was an apple fan that the unwritten rule was "never buy gen 1 of apple devices because they will have issues. Always wait for gen 2"

        The issues with their laptops, especially the main board, is legendary. Then there's bendgate, antennagate, the cracking of the cases of the white macbooks (which I had) etc

        Not a stellar record. Whereas typically we don't see these issues on PC's and Android phones. The only big one was the exploding Samsung Note 7, but Samsung recalled them all and cancelled the phone. Unlike Apple who said "you're holding it wrong" when their antenna design was the real problem.

  • pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This reminds me of the Samsung Phone incident… not as bad as that but it’s just something that popped up in my mind.

  • moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple is leveling up at each new phone. iPhone are average with a premium price.